thanks, Ann, nice play on words. Plus...got me chuckling.
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 10:28 AM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote : Richard, are you replying to Xeno or turq?! He's been responding to bawee all morning when he was really supposed to be responding to Xeno. Help him out Share, he seems to have become ker-fluffled. On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:24 AM, "'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: On 9/2/2014 7:55 AM, anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: >>I have been spending my time fiddling with the Yahoo e-mail sort rules. Previously I have only posted directly into FFL. I have not quite got it right yet, but I have got the FFL individual e-mails sorting into three separate folders FFL-fluff; FFL-maybe; and FFL-read. I have just not quite figured out how the API interprets the filters command 'SENDER contains...' > >We were all wondering what happened to you - you got an entire thread dedicated to your name, asking what happened to you, which has run into over 186 messages by now. That should have given you plenty of excuses to post something interesting to read about yourself. >> > >As soon as I get it right, assuming it works, I will resume posting, having filtered out most of the crap e-mails. Already all of Richard's e-mails are going into the FFL-fluff folder and not appearing in the main In-box or the read folder! If a new poster shows up, it will appear in the main In-box. This seemed better to me than trying to just block certain posters, just in case something interesting shows up. It just takes time to set up all the individual sort rules. Now that I have Richard's posts out of the way, I can work on the other insubstantial posters. > >You nerd! All I have to do is log on using another alias if I really wanted to get your attention, to get around your dumb filters. By the time you get all your filters set, you'll have missed out on all the fun. Everyone knows that the only way to filter out all my replies is to switch off the entire forum messages. >> > >I would vote to have Richard removed from FFL. > >You sound really JELLOS, and scared. Maybe my comments about the claimed Rama levitation events are getting to you. All you have to do is admit your experience was either drug induced or an illusion. Maybe your ego won't let you tell the truth. Go figure. >> > >With the old system of 50 posts a week, Alex had to deal with over posting every week. I suppose he would mind if he had to do that, say, every three months. That is, remove someone for posting excessively for a period of a quarter of a year, or maybe longer. That would not take too much extra effort. >> > >You are probably not making Alex's job any easier by sending him private emails complaining about my posting numbers on FFL. Run to Alex. Run to Alex, Barry. Sometimes you are so transparent, Barry. >> > > >> >>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : >> >> >>From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> >> >> >>If she who shall not be named wants to be anonymous, she should not post here with a subscription tied to her real name. As much as I like said person, her demands for anonymity under a non-anonymous identity are silly and unreasonable. >> >>While I agree with this, when are the moderators of Fairfield Life going to do something about the troll who is attempting to destroy it, as he destroyed a.m.t. a few years earlier, by spamming it with endless crap. Richard Williams has made almost 350 posts in a little over a week, and no one stands up to him and demands that he stop. >> >> >
