On Nov 9, 2005, at 12:15 AM, authfriend wrote:

It's important to understanding the study.  It's being

used as a way to suggest they changed things around

after seeing the data to get a better result, which isn't

what happened.  And you're using it to construct all kinds

of speculations about their methodology.  It's just

ridiculous.


They may have changed *other* things around, for all any

of us know, but they didn't just introduce the weather

after the fact.


Why do you think they MIU researchers refused to share their raw data with the University of Iowa?



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to