---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote :

 Universal Consciousness and subtle vibration theory is called "spanda" in the 
Trika philosophy of Kashmere. Trika refers to the three states: waking, 
sleeping, and dreaming; and a fourth state (turyia) which is beyond the "three 
cities" - Transcendental Wisdom (srividya). Spanda is the idea being that every 
thing, substance or entity in that exists has a vibration of some kind; from 
this vibration come consciousness, mind, ideas, name and form (nama-rupa). Thus 
everything is sound vibration - no matter how gross or fine.The Indian 
philosophy that supports this practice is Yoga. 
 
 In this philosophy of sound the supreme (para) subtle vibration is the first 
cause, which set in motion the myriad other sounds and hence other sounds - the 
whole phenomenological universe is sound vibration starting with a single 
primordial vibration which set the cosmos in motion.
 
 So, the whole creation is made up of sound currents; from the original subtle 
sound vibration down to objects and hence to human speech. The original 
vibration did not contain any grossness but when entering the plane of 
relativity takes on a coarseness, experienced as the human word arranged in 
speech.  
 
 MMY called this "the science of subtle sounds", which produced "Vac", the 
Goddess of Speech and "Chit" universal consciousness, as "Saraswati", the 
Goddess of Knowledege, which is one and includes the whole: Shiva - creation, 
dissolution, and maintenance. The spiritual exercises of yoga meditation 
includes silent repetition, "simran" on a seed (bija) by means of repetition 
(bhajan) and meditation given in initiation by a guru. Bija mantras are not 
words but subtle vibrations, the most subtle of which are the imperishable 
letters of the Sanskrit alphabet, which were cognized by the ancient rishis and 
are revealed to us as devine sounds.
 
 According to Swami Sivananda Radha, in order to attain single-pointedness of 
mind, a mantra can be used in the following ways: by chanting (japa) speaking 
(vaikhari japa), whispering or humming (upamsu japa) or by writing (likhita 
japa), or by silent mental repetition (dhyana). 
 
 
 >Vac by Andre Padoux, Translated by Jacques Gontier (I left out an accent mark 
 >from the title, and then again from the author, apologies)
 
 We do not really know exactly when Shankara and Guadapada lived and died - 
it's mostly speculation. There isn't even any historical proof that Shankara 
founded four monasteries in the first place. All we have is some manuscripts 
that were preserved and an oral tradition. We do know that Shankara quoted 
Chandrakiriti, the famous Buddhist logician.
 
 The distinctions between Advaita and Vajrayana are just too subtle for most 
causal readers. That's about all I can say at this point. Perhaps if you get 
time you can explain it in more detail. Apparently both Gaudpada and Shankara 
were cryoto-Buddhists: Nirvana is Brahman, the pure non-dual consciousness. 
There may be some finer details to consider, but this is the main gist of the 
doctrine. 
 
 The only doctrine to discuss would be the nature of maya as propounded by the 
Adi Shankara. There is just no reason I can determine that would justify a 
presupposition that Brahman is the ultimate reality, since it isn't an a priori 
notion, but everyone can experience the nature of Pure Consciousness, call it 
what you will.
 
 There is just nothing in the Vedic literature that would suggest the doctrine 
of non-dualism previous to Gaudapada. Madhva, Ramanuja, Vallabha, Nimbarka and 
Chaitanya all agree on this - all were dualists or quasi dualists. All of the 
Upanishads were composed after the historical Buddha's passing. And all of the 
Upanishadic thinkers were transcendentalists.  Apparently Gaudapda adopted the 
Buddhist doctrines that ultimate reality is pure consciousness and that the 
nature of the world is the four-cornered negation. Gaudapada adapted both 
doctrines into a philosophy of the Mandukaya Upanisad Karika, which was further 
developed by Shankara. The Vajrayana similarities are unmistakable, according 
to Raju and Sharma. 
 
 Compare:
 
 Excerpt from mANDUkya kArikA IV by gauDapAda:
 
 "Duality is only an appearance; non-duality is
 the real truth. The object exists as an object
 for the knowing subject; but it does not exist
 outside of consciousness because the distinction
 of subject and object is within consciousness."
 
 Excerpt from vijnApti matratA siddhi by vasAabAndhu: 
 
 "Reality is Pure Consciousness; external objects 
 do not exist outside thought. Reality can be 
 directly realized by transcending the 
 subject-object duality." - vimshAtika-Vrtti on kArikA
 
 Work cited:
 
 Raju 1992, Raju, P.T., The Philosophical Traditions of India, Motilal 
Banarsidass, p. 177.
 
 Sharma, Chandrahar, A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Rider, p. 245-246. 
 

Reply via email to