---In [email protected], <anartaxius@...> wrote :
Ann, I have been away for a few days and so did not finish my reply to
your comments on my post, but I finally finished it, while the FFL
forum has gone on to whatever else it has gone on to. Comments in the
text. I almost missed your post because it was in the folder with
Richard's oeuvre — difficult finding stuff in that folder — but
someone responded to your post who was in one of the folders I am more
likely to read. Thanks for taking time to write some responses that
are not brainless one liners.
>
On 9/10/2014 8:34 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
And thank you Xeno, for engaging here. Although there is much I would
differ on I usually appreciate your civil tone and seemingly
unswayable even keel impression that you usually give in your writing.
I am far more demonstrative and apparently animated in my style but
you seem like a gentle soul and the world needs more of those. I would
request, however, that you take me out of the "fluff" box because I
just don't think it quite fits the description of who I am and what I
write here. I'll get back to you with another descriptor once I think
of one. Others, no doubt, could give you some ideas on that as well.
>
At least he is not saying that ALL of your posts are fluff or "brainless
one-liners." This filtering and folder-making can be tedious and
complicated, especially when over 90% of the FFL messages go unread by
the informants. Half of the time they don't even realize they've just
been called fools and knaves. They actually think you're the one posting
the fluff. How backwards is that? Go figure.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
