On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > Except, as we've heard here many a time, it really wasn't his commentary. > He just approved but gave no credit to the scholar who wrote it. > > Vernon Katz did the transliteration on CBG. Everyone knows the commentary of MMY is by MMY - who else would have composed it? > > > So it goes in the big business of cults. > > So, it goes - do you have any evidence that MMY did not dictate the CBG commentary? If so, just post it so we can read it. Thanks. > > > > On 09/17/2014 03:19 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] > wrote: > > > > I wasn't there, with Shiva, or Parvati, during that discussion, and I just > wouldn't take an interpretation, on face value, from a third party. I liked > MMY's commentary - but I admit not having read any appreciable amount of > it, in years. Perhaps I will pick it up again. PS Anyone can write a > commentary. Whether or not people consider it authoritative, is a personal > matter, and not given to supposed edicts, from you, or anyone else. > > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : > > Who is limiting their horizon, here? > For decades I thought Mahesh Yogi's commentary was the be all and end all > of Bhagavad Gita commentaries. > Why? > Because the movement said so. > Ignorance is Bliss. > > Lord Shiva's discourse to Goddess Parvati..."Sri Guru Gita" explains who > is qualified and who is not. > > It is clear from this scripture where Mahesh Yogi stood. > > > >
