On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, netineti108 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > ---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote : > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:42 PM, netineti108 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > So what you insinuate here is that chapters 7-18 are insignificant and not > worthy of his time. > > > > What I am insinuating is that if you don't understand Chapter II verse 45 > of BG, and you don't know TM, and you have not read the MMY's CBG, is that > Chapter 7-18 are insignificant and not worth my time discussing it with you. > > > > Dear Fellow, After three + decades of the TMO, I knew it too well. > > > So, did you enjoy? > > > I derived great benefit from his CBG in my earlier years. > But it was incomplete and my statement that he was not qualified to > comment on the remaining chapters is evident as Mahesh Yogi was not > educated in the tradition and his actions showed it. > > > *According to what I've read, the Mahesh Yogi was with with SBS at his passing, So we can assume that the Mahesh Yogi was very important to SBS. We can also assume that the Mahesh Yogi was the most important scribe in all India at that time. Anyone that close to a saint would be so qualified that he would be the most qualified clerk on the planet!* *The Mahesh Yogi was the chief scribe of the Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath. Do you know what that means? SBS was the head of all the Saraswati Dasanami yogis of Northern India.* > > > If he was a maharishi, why did he have others by his side to interpret > Sanskrit/Veda? > Who was that sweet old Brahmarishi by his side at the Hague in 1985? > Also in Humboldt 1972, there was a Brahmarishi with his son interpreting > for Mahesh Yogi. > He was no maharishi. Again the western culture's ignorance just blindly > accepted this. > > > > What is written above is just intellectuallizing and is not a path with > knowledge to navigate. > > > > It's sounds pretty clear to me - go beyond or transcend the three gunas > born of nature. > > *"Oh Arjuna, the Vedic scriptures deal with subjects in the three modes of > the material nature. Become self-realized, transcendent to the three modes > in pure consciousness, free from duality and free from conceptions of > acquisition and preservation."* > > http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/verse-02-44.html > > > > > It is nothing new. Maybe to the Western mind, but not to those who are > brought up in the Vedic tradition. > > > > > Which Mahesh Yogi was not. He was a clerk. > > > > He was a yogi clerk - that's how he wrote his commentary. > > > > > He said, "I am not a personal guru" yet so many ignorant souls did not > know what Guru is. > > > > You are mistaken - he did not say this anywhere in CBG. Speak for yourself. > > > > I never claimed he said it in CBG. But he did say it. I heard him say it. > > *MMY on the Bhagavad Gita: * > *CBG: II., v. 45, p. 126 VI., v. 1, p. 384 * > > > > >
