I put up my first Web sites in 1996, and for YEARS before that I was already thinking I should do so.
Therefore, it's not a big stretch for many an astrologer to be hep to the Web's eventualities "in the early 90s." First computer I owned was in 1980 -- 16 years before the Web had it's first 500,000 surfers, but there was tons of talk everywhere in all the industrial rags about networking etc. Not to besmirch your beloved adviser, but rather to challenge your standards-for-approving-truth-tellers....seems to me hindsight is fudging your factors. I'm betting he knew you pretty good "in real life," before he cast the chart. Also note that some folks are VERY handy at sussing out folks ON THE SPOT. Almost all my readings included stuff like "you'll be buying a lot of electronics in the next five year period." Who can't that be true about, eh? To me, astrological reports are mere Rorschach tests.....we hear in them what we want to hear, have to hear, can't help but hear, are designed to hear, etc. And, hey, if framed thusly, the casting of a chart can be, well, go figure, a predictive process in that the person gets to see what they're projecting onto the charts, NOW, and those projections, yup, why sure they'll be somewhat predictive since they're based on the person's slow-to-evolve-actualities in the now -- not the stars. I don't see the charts laying out personal evolution's course even in a very broad fashion, but because the person being "read" is RIGHT THERE, what astrologer wouldn't use what's-to-be-seen as part of the predictive process? A person in a wheelchair is not going to get a "oh, you'll walk in ten years" from ANY astrologer no matter how piled-high the signs can be. I have six planets in Leo, and I should be king of the world. Yeah, right.
