can you see you are a sycophant? I guess not, or you would rehabilitate yourself.
________________________________ From: danfriedman2002 <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 9:31 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jerry email to John sent on Sunday ---In [email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In [email protected], <mjackson74@...> wrote : whose privacy is being invaded? Given the nature and tone of the letter I certainly can't see why it would have to be confidential in any way. I thought he stated his reasons for finding George's "conversation" with MMY suspect and perhaps superfluous and it all came across as simply his viewpoint on the thing. Why Hagelin would feel he needs to keep this letter private and exclusive smacks of the hierarchical BS that seems to abound in the Movement - something I can't abide. Hagelin's letter was fine, there were no trade secrets, no mysteries revealed, nothing shocking to report. I respect his views given his experience of having been around MMY and I don't think his letter was unreasonable or extreme in any way. I don't think it needs to be private because it simply gives the reader a clear idea of where Hagelin stands on this subject (no surprises there). Dear Ann, If a person wishes to keep their private letters private. That is their right. It is not up to someone else to decide whether the content deserves privacy. Do you see that? Dan ________________________________ From: "srijau@..." <srijau@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jerry email to John sent on Sunday There is no compelling public interest in this that justifies the invasion of privacy of this confidential communication.
