---In [email protected], <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote :
Nicely said Buck, you really nailed it. Spoken by a man who gloats about reading Private and Confidential communications and proceeding to denigrate the contents. Good example to follow. And, lest I forget, THE investigative reporter on the scene. Embedded and 'on the ground'. ---In [email protected], <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote : I found Haglin's letter reassuring. I was looking for guidance about Hammond's channeling meeting. Everyone was last week when it came out. Most things shared and sent around the Meditating community no longer make it on to FFL. But the talk on the street, at work, in the community e-mail and messaging last week around Mammond's meeting and Jerry Jarvis being involved was huge. Hagelin's message proly started off internal and then was wanted to go outside for practical reasons of quickly informing the larger movement community. It got the message out which became need at the time with some clarity. It was leaked for a reason. You are splitting hairs over whether it was private or not. It was timely once it came out and no longer private before it ever appeared on FFL. That is also how a community functions, -Buck on the Street turquoiseb writes: From: "srijau@..." <srijau@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:04 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] a right to privacy Rick Archer, maybe I missed it but you still just seem to be evading answering the question of how you had the right to violate someone's privacy but publishing this email, what was it about this email that compelled you to take such a step? What is it about this email that makes you so panicky that it was made public?
