---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote :
Easy Barry, easy. Enough with the posturing for the "lurking reporters". We get your faux outrage. This issue has importance for you only in the sense that you can do some TM bashing. Other than that, I don't think you give a damn. Settle back down. You are on the money here, Steve. bawee finds himself suddenly animated from his slouch on the TV couch when he smells the equivalent of bacon frying in the kitchen. As soon as the odor of some half-baked story wafts onto FFL he is all over it, salivating. I don't quite see the connection of how a man in his 20's who allegedly was guilty of gross sexual misconduct with children has much to do with whatever his connection to the TM movement is now and how that reflects badly on the movement. How does it all compute? Is it that some asshole pedophile eventually became a Hollywood actor and somehow became endorsed by the TM movement and has now been exposed 4 decades later as a pedophile therefore makes TM invalid or the movement suspect because they didn't know this guy had sexually abused young children 40 years ago and now they do and... I'm confused. What great revelation am I missing here? How does 4+7= 13?