On 10/17/2014 7:53 PM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:
If ISIS used WMD in Baghdad, the tenor of the US response will change
in equal or greater measure. I think Obama is believing that ISIS is
an Arab problem and it should be resolved by the Arab nations in the
Middle East. But, so far, no Arab nations have volunteered to help
Iraq out by providing troops to fight the ISIS militants.
>
/There is not going to be any help from Arab nations because they are
all Arab nations. The only criterion will be if a nation is a member of
the Islamic Caliphate, or not. Every nation on the planet is the enemy
if you don't support ISIS, the Sunni Islamic State Army. It's not
complicated./
>
If the militants use WMD in the USA or any of the European countries
who are members of NATO,
>
/It's not a matter of "if" - it's just a matter of when.
>
/
we'll find NATO forces back in Iraq very quickly to wipe out the ISIS
threat.
>
/If anyone wanted to prevent the use of WMD they would have supported
the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the subsequent occupation to find and
destroy the WMD. Everyone knew that Saddam had stockpiles - that's why
the U.S. invaded Iraq in the first place. There are no European troops
on the ground in Iraq at this time, so that pretty much tells you who is
going to support the U.S. goal of "degrading and destroying" ISIS./
>
---In [email protected], <emptybill@...> wrote :
Remember how W. and Chaney "lied" because there "never" were WMD's in
Iraq? Heh Heh.
Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual bombs
and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They were NOT all
found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein Ebola ordered US
troops out of the country.
Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these supplies.
ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these WMD to strike
Baghdad.
After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
