From: "anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:17 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Belief in God is a form of mental illness The human species lack of hard wiring makes us more flexible for learning; we do not go out and dig burrows and look for nuts in the forest everyday (usually), but it makes us susceptible to the mental equivalent of a viral attack. We here have all experienced the attack, and many here are still dancing to the virus's tune. This is why I called religion a memetic malady or disease. That is different from organic insanity. Religion is induced insanity. I can live with that. But I don't see any difference in the end state that the "induced insanity" of religion creates and the end state that "organic insanity" creates. Either way, one is insane. Maybe it's a Buddhist thing...Buddhists aren't really concerned about HOW things got to be the way they are, only THAT they are the way they are, and how to make the best of that. The question for 'spiritually' oriented individuals would be, is there a way to construct a system that gives us these experiences of unboundedness that does not also wreak havoc with this gullibility weakness in the human nervous system. But that would presuppose that there is an actual VALUE to these "experiences of unboundedness." That has not been established, merely assumed by centuries of religious fanatics trying to convince others that its value trumps everything else. I would suggest going back to the starting point and, if you want to invent a better system, make a case for these types of experience having a value in the first place. Most religions have never tried to do this. They just make declarations like Maharishi did, along the lines of "The purpose of life is to achieve these experiences of unboundedness," which then become dogma and are repeated and believed by successive generations of believers. But he never said WHY these experiences were supposedly worth achieving. Start now...what do YOU see as the VALUE of these "experiences of unboundedness" you speak of? If you can't establish that they *have* a value, then why do we need a system of *any* kind to achieve them?