On 11/2/2014 8:06 PM, curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:

I get it that you are trying to shut down free speech you don't like but small problem:
defamation doesn't apply to dead people.

It is the exception. From your own link: To be defamation it must be.

  * Be about an identifiable living person or company

/A FFL informant recently insinuated that I was "insane" - he could be charged with slander. I am obviously still alive and have never been diagnosed with a mental illness.

///Once a FFL informant insinuated that I was a perv. /Another informant claimed I was once in prison, which is false.

It is against the FFL rules to slander someone. They should be expelled or at least be given a warning and put on probation.///

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

Statements are being made here which are not merely opinions but demonstrably false claims.

    *4. No exceptions to the rule*

Bloggers and citizen journalists are held to the exact same defamation standards as reporters who are being paid to report regularly.

  • [FairfieldLife]... srijau
    • [Fairfield... curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
    • [Fairfield... curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
        • [F... s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
    • Re: [Fairf... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
    • [Fairfield... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Reply via email to