"Professor of Maharishi Vedic Science? It's like they don't even want to be taken seriously."
Of course they want to be taken seriously - they just expect everyone in the world to accept without question their version of reality which is barking mad. ________________________________ From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 5:19 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Scientist Reviews Three Types of Meditation ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote : In regard to Orme-Jonhson, I was sitting near him once and the discussion he was having with someone had to do with data from the Maharishi Effect research. He mentioned that some other researchers wanted to see the raw data, and it seemed he was not going to give it to them, saying 'You know what they would do with it'. We do indeed know, they'd have a look to see what the hell is going on and blow it out of the water if that's what it deserves. Not letting other researchers look at what it is you've done to reach your conclusions is the very essence of bad science because if it can't be checked there's no reason for anyone to believe it. Especially as it's in such a contentious area. I do remember reading that they'd refused to hand over raw data before but could never find any evidence online, it would have helped in the many arguments I've had about the ME research over the years. Just checking the MUM website, the universitydoes not have a neuroscience department. Fred Travis, for example, is a Professor of Maharishi Vedic Science, not a professor of a scientific discipline that are researching meditation at other universities. Professor of Maharishi Vedic Science? It's like they don't even want to be taken seriously. Vedic Astrology Research Vedic Astrology Research The thousands of individuals enjoying the benefits of the Jyotish and Yagya Programmes provide the best documentation of the Vedic Science of... View on maharishi-program... Preview by Yahoo