Some funny points, like enlightenment would be an LSD trip. Hilarious what the mind imagines as a peaceful state, prior to accomplishing it. The ironic thing is, that once the state establishes itself, the world changes to one that was unimaginable anyway, because there is finally peace within, and that changes everything. As for the personality traits, I find myself more sensitive as the natural expansion of life continues, but otherwise, the main change is the lack of attachment, evident in CC, and so the personality actually gains a greater range, because there is nothing, except judgment, holding it back - everything becomes known, but not everything is expressed. That non-attachment allows the mind to go anywhere it likes; many more cultural and natural edges to explore.
As far as old souls, I don't know what is old, except I do know some younger people who are fully enlightened, without having done any techniques, and who have absolutely no interest in spiritual pursuits like meditation. It is not a compartmentalized world for them, like it was for us, with a dedicated spiritual path - That sensitivity and awareness is already baked in, so although they recognize spiritual life and God as natural components to life, those elements have no special significance, because they came onto the planet with that consciousness, already. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : I've always said the "experiencing enlightenment" is the thing to say even if it is for a few minutes a day. Honestly, I think some folks believe that enlightenment will put them in a perpetual state of celestial consciousness as if you were always on LSD. That, of course, would not be very practical. Basically it is an "inner silence" which is not pervasive or you could never deal with everyday situations. You'd just have to sit there like a lump. People here who experience that "inner silence" (and I believe there are probably more than a few here who do) know that they have it when they focus on it but when they need to focus on worldly things it doesn't get in the way. I know a number of people who even just doing TM will say "CC was a long time ago." Whether you got there or not seems to depend on your nervous system or maybe if you are more spiritually inclined then development in past incarnations. People like to say that those who popped into are probably "old souls." So even the spiritual community will have a group who is sorry to say "left behind." If you could force them into enlightenment they might not be able to handle it. Believe me, I also know people who practiced TM and said they never experienced transcendence just some relaxation. I hope they only paid no more than $75 for it then. Another faux paus is that some people believe there are personality markers that indicate "enlightenment". That is not true at all. So you can't judge the "book by it's cover" especially on the Internet. ;-) On 11/18/2014 11:26 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: First of all, I'm familiar with spiritual groups who proclaim people enlightened. I didn't always agree with their proclamations! And as mentioned, I know of a group who gives certificates of enlightenment. Maybe they use different criteria than me! I also know people in the TMO who I think are pretty darn enlightened. But of course they don't proclaim themselves as such. The whole thing is such a hodge podge that I simply ignore all the posturing and go by my own sense of a person. And actually, it doesn't matter to me whether or not they're "enlightened." There are other qualities that I value more. From: "TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 12:06 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Most Absurd Rumor From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" On 11/18/2014 09:17 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com On11/18/2014 04:26 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: It's not so much a rumor, more of a sales pitch or claim, but I've always gotten a chuckle from "TM is the fastest path to enlightenment on the planet," coming from an organization that in over 50 years has been unable to produce even a single person they can point at and say, "This person is enlightened, and got that way as a result of practicing TM." What organization does? Just to make a point about the kinds of bullshit humans are willing to accept, think about the TM sales pitch for enlightenment, compared to almost anything else being sold on this planet: -- "So, that's your introductory lecture. Just sign here, pay us your $75, and we promise you that you will be fully enlightened in five years." (Please note that this actually *happened* with the TM movement.) --"Sounds good, but looking into my crystal ball that shows me the future, I can see that what you're trying to sell me isn't going to cost me only $75, but tens of thousands of dollars over 30 or 40 years, to pay for all the extra courses and 'add-ons' you'll try to sell me. What can you show me to convince me that this 'enlightenment' you're trying to sell me will actually occur, and that if it does, it's worth it? -- "Well, you just have to trust us. Give us your money now, and in 5 to 8 years (ooops, sorry about that) you'll be enlightened. And you've heard the lectures -- when you're enlightened, you'll be able to know everything and have everything you want just by wanting it. Isn't that worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars (ooops again) you'll wind up paying us?" --"It *might* be worth it, but what can you show me to prove to me that this 'enlightenment' you're selling me actually exists? For example, there are many people here in the room today who have been practicing TM for more than 8 years, the maximum time you say it will take to become enlightened. Point out the ones who are enlightened, and let me talk to them to figure out if this is all going to be worth it." -- "Sorry. <insert reverential tone of bullshit here> 'We don't talk about our individual state of consciousness.'" --"WTF? So you're saying that I just have to TRUST you about all this enlightenment stuff, and you are NEVER going to show me anyone who you can guarantee has achieved it?" -- "That's right." --"You DO know that this is insane, right? Promising the 'fastest path' to something you'll later refuse to ever produce?" -- "You think WE'RE insane? Talk to the millions of people who bought this exact sales pitch hook, line, and sinker." :-) It's a "path to enlightenment" but my point was that no organization I know of guarantees it. You can't. It even goes against TM teaching because one's progress is dependent on the state of their nervous system. And by no means would it be the fastest. It really is just a meditation for the masses. It's nothing special other than it was probably better organized than some of the other front runners. Bhairitu, it's not "guaranteeing enlightenment" that I'm riffing on for hopefully humorous purposes. It's the promising it for 50 years and never *producing* it I'm riffing on. That, and the fact that they got away with it because their clientele was too stupid to ever say, "Now wait a minute...where are all these enlightened people you promised me I'd be surrounded by and be one of? Point them out to me. Show me an enlightened person." Someone saying that -- *anyone* saying that -- would have been the counterpart of the line in the fairy tale that goes, "Uh, guys...you *have* noticed that the Emperor has no clothes on, right?" Asked to put up or shut up and actually *produce* a "certified TM enlightened person," the TMO wouldn't have been able to do so. It's all a house of cards perpetuated by the fact that no one ever says, "Show me an enlightened person."