No kidding. That fight would last about two seconds, with Barry crapping 
himself, and insisting he was just joking.  
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 A fit Richard against a beer-bellied, delusional, old man ? It's pretty 
obvious who'd be "beaten into a bloody pulp"

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fleetwood_macncheese@...> wrote :

 The funny thing is, if any of us were to visit Leiden and find Barry, we would 
find a half-drunken chickenshit, disavowing all that he has said here. You see, 
Barry is a coward, hiding behind these forums. He wouldn't have the guts to 
push his agenda, face to face. I may prove that, one of these days. :-)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote :

 On 11/22/2014 3:29 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
 >
 
   Well said, Sal. 
 
 
 
 My bet is that if there were ever a "FFL Reunion," in which we all got 
together physically to chat over a few beers, most people would manage to let 
bygones be bygones and get along. Heck, I'd even buy Judy a drink...not that 
she'd drink it, of course.  :-)


 >
 How much would you be willing to wager?
 >
 But Richard? My bet is that after a few minutes people would notice he was 
missing from the festivities. A few people would wonder where he went, but not 
many, and only for a second or two. 
 




 >
 How much would you be willing to wager - do you have a PayPal account?
 >
 
 
 After the event they'd find him out back in the alley, having been beaten into 
a bloody pulp by the people he's stalked and abused for so many years. 




 >
 So, it's all about Richard and not about your cognitive dissonance.Go figure.
 >
 
 
 
 From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<sharelong60@...> mailto:sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 Richard, I'm really sorry that turq has been so mean to you, and for so many 
years. You seem like a really nice person to me so I don't understand his 
behavior at all. But I'm very glad you're still here.
 

 I think it's more relevant to try and explain Willytex's behaviour and why 
he's irritating enough to drive people to distraction. Just try simply not 
having an opinion the same as his and you'll get endless tedious trolling, and 
I mean endless. I can't believe you haven't noticed it. If it wasn't for the 
ability to scan posts without opening them there wouldn't be anyone here 
because he's like a little dog snapping at your heels. On and on and on. I 
suspect that's his plan, a sort of attempt at denial of service.
 

 If you ever do try and engage him on his opinions all you get is some well 
practised non-committal slogans and a few irrelevant links to wikipedia that he 
either doesn't understand himself or can't be bothered to think about it.  
After two post he goes straight back to abuse. Years and years and years he's 
been doing it, what he gets out of logging on here everyday is anyone's guess. 
He says he's proud of his internet legacy, but why take part in a discussion 
board if you aren't going to discuss anything? I think he just likes spreading 
shit around. This is why nobody bothers talking to him. Go figure.
 
 
 Same with Steve, he replied to a post of mine yesterday saying that it looked 
boring and he wasn't going to read it! What the fuck? Tell me Share, is there a 
point to it that you can see? I'm at a loss. If I see something that doesn't 
interest me I just skip to the next one, why make a point about it. Every time. 
Every day.
 
 
 Barry, on the other hand brings a lot to the place and isn't just a one trick 
pony with nothing to say. You may not agree with what he says but it is a 
discussion board and not a facebook page, we all have the choice to respond and 
alternatives with how we spend out time if we'd rather not.
 
 
 It actually fascinates me that we all come back day after day. 
 

 Ugh, the rain has begun. Supposedly will turn to ice overnight. So glad I've 
got brand new tires.

 
 From: "'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 9:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Good article by someone with more patience 
for theists than I have...
 
 
   On 11/21/2014 7:14 AM, fleetwood_macncheese wrote:
 >
 
 It really isn't ganging up, Share, anymore than everyone laughing at the same 
joke at a comedy club, is ganging up, on the subject of that joke. Think about 
it. Yes, there is something that bothers you here, but you haven't got it yet.

 >
 For the record, this is payback for all the shit he has given me for the past 
ten years. The tables are turned now, his turn to cry. 
 
 The guy has been a shit-heel as long as I've been around the internet - that's 
his game. 
 
 Frankly, I don't care what he thinks or says - he's never accomplished a damn 
thing, so far as I can tell.
 >
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<sharelong60@...> mailto:sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 Steve, I don't mind when people confront turq one on one. But I really don't 
like it when the piling on and ganging up happens. Something about that seems 
very unhealthy to me, mainly for the people doing it.



 




 
 







 



 
 








 








Reply via email to