From: "TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Since so many seem to be vying for this position, I propose another "test" to 
help determine the winner. Uh...I mean, the ultimate loser. 
JohnR has already expressed his dismay at having been considered less dumb than 
Jim, so I graciously retracted my suggestion that JimF is dumber, and allowed 
JohnR to retain his title. 

BUT, in other threads, Nabby seems to be moving down the list towards the 
bottom fast in *his* attempt to be considered the Dumbest by coming out as a 
fan of cannibalism. You've got to admit that considering Indian vagrants who 
eat other people "saints" is pretty dumb, and tough to beat. That's even dumber 
than Waiting For Maitreya, which was Nabby's previous low mark in terms of 
Dumbnessitude. 

Therefore I suggest that if there needs to be a tie-breaker to decide whether 
JohnR or JimF are really the Dumbest, the title will go to whichever one of 
them "piles on" to the pro-cannibalism idea first and supports Nabby in his 
quest for the taste of human flesh. 

I don't see any of the rest of the bottom-dwellers (Steve, Share, Ann, Richard) 
as having the ability to think on their own enough to win the Who Will Consume 
Human Flesh First contest, so I'm going to give the "edge" to JimF in this 
contest. After all, he's *already* moved out into the boonies, where there are 
fewer people around to notice if some of them go missing at the same time Jim 
seems to be preparing a new buncha meat for the winter in his smokehouse. 

The only question seems to be whether Jimbo will share any of his Long Pig with 
Nabby, who, after all, suggested it first. If that happens, I suggest that we 
allow JimF and Nabby to share the title of "Dumbest," with JohnR in second 
place. 
 
Aha. Now we understand why Maharishi ripped off the Burger King crown for his 
Rajas:




  

Reply via email to