On 11/29/2014 3:43 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
The problem could be solved just doing two things which you will hate:
1) a basic guaranteed income so no one falls through the cracks.
The need for this is becoming more obvious than ever as jobs
disappear due to automation.
2) an income and estate limit the latter probably for about $20
million. Reach that and every penny over goes to the government to
help fund number 1. Now there's plenty leeway in between but if you
are so materialistic and greedy that $20 million isn't enough then
perhaps you belong in an insane asylum.
My system is one everyone would love:
1) Universal employment making good money so everyone can pay their
On 11/29/2014 8:12 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
And the jobs come from where? The government? Well that screws up
your number 2 proposal.
/Jobs that pay good money don't come from the government - they come
from the private sector./
2) A smaller government with a balanced budget and no taxation.
And you propose to pay for that tiny government how? You can have a
smaller government with my proposal.
/A small federal government doesn't need a big budget - most of the
governing should be in the individual states./
3) Unlimited freedom to earn and save or spend as much money as you want.
Would be gamed by the selfish and greedy. The wannabe napoleons. We
don't need any stinkin' napoleons. They fuck everything up.
/Freedom means freedom to be selfish and greedy, if that's what they want./
It's simply that our system has become dysfunctional for it's
citizens and time for change.
Our free market system was voted in by the *people* who hold the
power - it's the individuals who don't believe in freedom and liberty
and equality that are dysfunctional. /No government should be allowed
to spend more money than it has in the bank./
So cut defense spending. Oh, can't do that, America must be number
one and exceptional. What a fool's dream!
/No, cut the federal budget by downsizing to pay for self-defense. The
federal government should have a balanced budget, no borrowing./
Political power is inherent in the *people.* When individuals rebel
and break the law they should be punished.
So you would have thrown the founding fathers in prison?
/The founding fathers represented the //*people*//- they did not act as
individuals.//Anyone that threatens the liberty of others, to seal
"rich" people inside bunkers with concrete, or attempts overthrow the
elected government, should be arrested, punished and put in prison.
Anyone should be free to be rich if they want to be. It's in the U.S.