Yes Ghost written for the most part & later more errors when found & which were NOT not noticed by the mainly Purusha writers were then corrected subsequently & up dated in several revisions In a message dated 12/18/2014 12:28:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, no_re...@yahoogroups.com writes:
I met John Fagan once, just after he'd announced his rejection of government funding (I think it was) for doing research into GMO's. He came over to do some promotion work with the Natural Law Party who had joined the coalition of the willing in raising public awareness about GM tech. Fagan did a lecture at a London university that was quite interesting, he concentrated on the trouble with the unforseen consequences of meddling with nature and the inadequate testing involved in GM safety. However, he promised us TMers with a special lecture at HQ that I was looking forward to as I thought he might be a bit more technical about DNA and how it all works but all he had was the SCI consciousness angle. Apparently Maharihsi had been telling him that GMO's disrupt the natural flow of knowledge from the unified field and would prevent us getting enlightened. It depressed me at the time as it was like an intro lecture instead of some hard science. It would tie in well with King Tony's books though so I'm surprised we never heard more about it. It might have given John Hagelin a chance to get his string theories into the food chain too. The trouble with this SCI approach was that they couldn't say any of it public and had to hide behind the non-existent evidence against GMO which amounted to fear of the unknown or distaste at mixing genes from different species. Consequently they looked a bit out of place at most of the anti-GM conventions we attended. Just for once I'd like to have seen them stand up and say what they really think in public, it would have raised a few eyebrows amongst all the proper scientists present! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : Given the fact that Fagan is one and has been one of the TM elite scientists, excuse me, so called scientists whom Marshy used to puff up the repu tation of TM and the TMO with questionable assertions over scientific "proof" that TM is good good good, given the fact that the Marshy and the Movement lied and lies about: The mantras The provenance of TM itself The effects of TM (as in overstating the positive effects of TM) Lying about the lack of unpleasant effects of TM and the TMSP Lying about the Marshy Effect Lying about the effect of yagyas Lying about the use of money And on and on, what are the odds that a TM insider who is using an official TMO position on GMO crops to make money is doing so only from altruistic motives? ____________________________________ From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:17 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why the TMO don't like GMO's We have adobe soil here not sand. But adobe soil is bad enough because it puts my doors out of whack when the moisture changes. No, I see no problem in Fagan marketing a testing system. It's his company isn't it not the TMO? Besides that's a bristling business and he will have plenty of competition. And not everything the TMO does is bad. On 12/17/2014 09:56 AM, Michael Jackson _mjackson74@..._ (mailto:mjackson74@...) [FairfieldLife] wrote: You either have you head in the sand or you are much more forgiving than I am. When someone who is an insider in the TMO which itself is famous for saying one thing and doing another, and famous for taking money through subterfuge and false pretenses come out swinging at a particular windmill and then, under the radar sets up a company that charges big money to do what he is calling EVERYONE to do, then it raises the red flag. Plus Fagan is not calling for an END to GMO's - he just wants to be the go to guy to TEST for GMO's. Take note of the article that Fagan was lobbying the US gov'ment to implement HIS testing method. "Fagan has lobbied the FDA to adopt his genetic labeling certification method as the official U.S. standard" He likes GMO's cuz he makes money off of them. If he was really agin GMO's he would be out there trying to stop them, not test for them. He is using the same tactics Marshy taught him - cry wolf and get the government to pay for it. ____________________________________ From: "Bhairitu _noozguru@..._ (mailto:noozguru@...) [FairfieldLife]" _<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>_ (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com) To: _FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com) Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why the TMO don't like GMO's I sure can't see what is wrong with labeling products that have GMO. Just reminds us of what a bunch of scum the people that run big food companies are. OTOH, we have smaller companies taking advantage of the controversy by labeling their products, usually things that have never been GMO, with "No GMO." And while the big food companies don't want to label GMO, they are jumping on the "No HFCS" bandwagon and some on the "No MSG" bandwagon. I also can't fault Fagan for doing this either. He was probably on the scene a bit earlier than other folks. On 12/17/2014 08:06 AM, Michael Jackson _mjackson74@..._ (mailto:mjackson74@...) [FairfieldLife] wrote: I don't particularly like GMO crops for several reasons that have nothing to do with the TMO. But I always wondered why Marshy opposed them. His and the TMO's opposition never really fit in with the rest of the Old Fraud's grab for power and money. Then I ran across this today: "The Maharishi University of Management’s graduate dean is a physicist named John Fagan, whose 1995 book alleged that genetically improved foods represented “grave hazards to health, agriculture, and the environment.” Fagan’s own mantra is a warning against biotech foods combined with a call for “independent” safety testing. Not coincidentally, Fagan owns a company (also based in Fairfield, Iowa) called Genetic ID, which happens to own a method of testing food for the presence of genetically engineered ingredients. Fagan has lobbied the FDA to adopt his genetic labeling certification method as the official U.S. standard, hoping to make his company a direct beneficiary of the push to pre-test all food. Genetic ID also produced the laboratory results on which Greenpeace based the StarLink corn scare." Its from this web site: _Mothersfor Natural Law | Activist Facts_ (https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/18-mothers-for-natural-law/) (https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/18-mothers-for-natural-law/) _Mothers for Natural Law | Activist Facts_ (https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/18-mothers-for-natural-law/) Mothers for Natural Law (M4NL) is an offshoot of the Natural Law Party (NLP), formed in 1996 with the goal of delivering the quasi-religious ideas of the NLP throug... _View on www.activistfacts.com_ (https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/18-mothers-for-natural-law/) Preview by Yahoo
