---In [email protected], <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

 From: "s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
 
   It's an odd kind of duty to publish cartoons that mock the founder of one of 
the world's largest religions in the way that is plainly meant to be deeply 
offensive to adherents of that faith. You say things cut both ways, and the 
matter of respecting the faith of others does also. 
 

 Why should anyone *respect* a faith they regard as intolerant of
 gays or women or free speech? Respect has to be earned. I support anyone's 
right to criticize Islam as robustly and satirically as they wish; just as I 
support someone's right to argue that liberal attitudes to sexuality are 
repugnant. Let everyone say what they wish; we can listen to their claims and 
come to our own conclusions. What are you afraid of?

 

 


 


 Thank you for saying this. 
 

 There is this terrible meme we have inherited for centuries -- both in the 
East and in the West -- that says, "If we call it 'religious', it's 
*protected*. You can't say bad stuff about it or criticize it."
 

 During many of these centuries, the people saying this were IN CHARGE. Their 
religion *ran* things. So if anyone *did* say anything critical of their 
"religious" beliefs, they just killed their asses. Simple as that. 

 

 What we're seeing today in radical Islam and in the fundamentalist extremes of 
religion such as Hindu Supremacy is a bunch of religious people wishing that 
the world still worked that way. They'd really *like* to KILL anyone who 
doesn't believe the way they think they should. 

 

 Currently on planet Earth, only one major religion is actually consistently 
claiming to be PROUD of doing that -- killing anyone who doesn't believe the 
way they think they should. 

 

---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote :

 It's an odd kind of duty to publish cartoons that mock the founder of one of 
the world's largest religions in the way that is plainly meant to be deeply 
offensive to adherents of that faith. You say things cut both ways, and the 
matter of respecting the faith of others does also. 
 

---In [email protected], <s3raphita@...> wrote :

 Re "That other people don't see the world the same way you do should be the 
first thing they have to teach at these "faith" schools.":
 

 Well, yes. But can you imagine a state, secular school teaching kids that some 
people regard homosexuality as an abomination, or that women's place is in the 
home, etc, etc? It cuts both ways.
 

 John Stuart Mill in On Liberty argued that we should always have some private 
(non-state) schools otherwise the state would simply use its monopoly to push 
the ideology of the ruling Establishment. He was right then; he's right now.
 

 The problem is we have two opposing fundamentalisms: religious versus new 
atheist/PC thinking. I don't subscribe to either as I want people to question 
all authority. But you don't learn to question authority in school! I suspect 
you don't *learn* it at all - you either have an enquiring mind or you don't.
 

 Anyway, salutations to those killed at Charlie Hebdo. They died in the line of 
duty.
 

 








 


 











Reply via email to