Not all quantum physicists are lazy, Jason, but the resident "science writers" on this forum sure seem to be so. One guy is a true believer in human levitation and the other guy still prays to the Hindu gods twice a day. One other informant seems to think that "shunning" works as a debate tactic when he reads something he doesn't agree with or doesn't like, so he files it away in a fluff folder using Yahoo Mail. Go figure.
---In [email protected], <jason_green2@...> wrote : According to you, all the quantum physicists are lazy? I suppose assuming about spirits and soul, is hard scientific work? You sure are a hard ass. --- <inmadison@...> wrote : just say We don't know but the event is analyzable . . . then go home and have dinner with the SO. Instead of calling it 'random' - which is just woo for science folks who are afraid the conversation might degrade into talking about spirits or the soul. But then, I'm a hard ass : ) Claiming some event is random just means the event is too complicated and we don't understand it yet. So there is no calling a thing random, that is only being lazy.
