Ah, yes... The Daily Telegraph.  Quoting Wikipedia:

"
 In June 2014, The Telegraph was criticised by Private Eye 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye for its policy of replacing 
experienced journalists and news managers with less-experienced staff and 
Search Engine Optimisers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEO[18] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-18 On 10 September 
2014, the Telegraph Media Group advertised in the Daily Telegraph for a new 
Head of Interactive Journalism stating candidates should "have demonstrable 
interest in news and journalism (previous newsroom experience is not needed 
however)".[19] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-19
 In July 2014, the Daily Telegraph was further criticised for carrying links on 
its website to pro-Kremlin articles supplied by a Russian state-funded 
publication that downplayed any Russian involvement in the downing of the 
passenger jet Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_17.[20] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-20 These had 
featured on its website as part of a commercial deal, but were later 
removed.[21] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-21 The 
paper is paid £900,000 a year to include the supplement Russia Beyond the 
Headlines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_Beyond_the_Headlines, a 
publication sponsored by the Rossiyskaya Gazeta 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossiyskaya_Gazeta, the Russian government's 
official newspaper. It is paid a further £750,000 a year for a similar 
arrangement with the Chinese state in relation to the pro-Beijing China Watch 
supplement.[22] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-22
 Political stance The Daily Telegraph has been politically conservative in 
modern times.[23] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-slate-23 The 
personal links between the paper's editors and the leadership of the 
Conservative Party http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_%28UK%29, 
along with the paper's generally right wing 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics stance and influence over 
Conservative activists, have resulted in the paper commonly being referred to, 
especially in Private Eye http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye, as the 
Torygraph.[23] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Telegraph#cite_note-slate-23 Even when 
Conservative support was shown to have slumped in the opinion polls and Labour 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Party_%28UK%29 became ascendant in them 
(particularly when leader Tony Blair http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blair 
rebranded the party as "New Labour http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Labour"; on 
becoming leader after the death of John Smith 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Smith_%28Labour_Party_leader%29 in 1994), the 
newspaper remained loyal to the Conservatives. This loyalty continued after 
Labour ousted the Conservatives from power by a landslide election result in 
1997 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_1997, and in 
the face of Labour election wins in 2001 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_2001 and the 
third successive Labour election win in 2005 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_2005.";
 

 In other words, this article is Right Wing Link Bait.  It's like getting cell 
phone voice mail tips from Murcoch;s defunct The News of the World.
 

 And while I'm quoting Wikipedia here is a quote from there on Christopher 
Booker:
 "

 Christopher John Penrice Booker (born 7 October 1937) is an English 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalist 
and author. In 1961, he was one of the founders of the magazine Private Eye 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye, and has contributed to it since then. 
He has been a columnist for The Sunday Telegraph 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Telegraph since 1990.[1] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker#cite_note-1 He has taken a 
stance which runs counter to the scientific consensus on a number of issues, 
including global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming, the link 
between passive smoking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_smoking and 
cancer,[2] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker#cite_note-passivesmoking-2 and 
the dangers posed by asbestos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos.[3] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker#cite_note-3 In 2009, he 
published The Real Global Warming Disaster 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Real_Global_Warming_Disaster.";
 
Douche-baggery!
 

 

Reply via email to