That's pretty much the way it goes with Buckheimer's shows. Passable
entertainment but nothing spectacular. I just found the subject
interesting enough to see what they were going to do with it.
On 03/12/2015 07:48 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I agree. The characters are wooden and stereotyped. I mean, c'mon,
they couldn't come up with something more original than the head
neckbeard *literally* being a neckbeard? That said, I'm still gonna
watch it and see how long I can stand it. I'm used to bad acting in
the CSI franchise, but this one completely lacks the entertainment
value of HoCaine and the SoJ (for the non-hipsters, that's Horatio
Caine and the Sunglasses of Justice.)
---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote :
We have another "agree to disagree" series here. I thought this was
TERRIBLE, with a capital Ick. Bad writing, bad music, bad casting, and
bad ideas. I turned it off after ten minutes. BTW, it's called "CSI
Cyber," not "Cyber." TERRIBLE. Won't even last the full season IMO.
---In [email protected], <noozguru@...> wrote :
Another new series is CBS's "Cyber" with Patricia Arquette. I watched
it last night. Jerry Buckheimer does know how to show run so I
suspect it will do well though not ever achiever excellence. I had
seen the trial episode of it where Arquette's character was involved
in a crime investigation on CSI. I was surprised that the writers did
do some homework and the tech was not as far-fetched as some of the
tech the CSI folks had.
