Yes, was going to mention that but then we were already way deep into
header code for the majority here. Plus I wanted to verify that other
"no_reply" post had that encrypted field but didn't have time.
On 03/18/2015 11:59 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Anonymous posts don't have an X-Originating header. They have an
X-Yahoo-Post-EncIP:
header, which is probably the originating IP address in encrypted
form, such that Yahoo could produce the originating IP if legally
compelled to do so. Here is ak_ak's header:
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Apparently-To: [email protected]
X-Received: (qmail 29991 invoked by uid 102); 17 Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mtaq1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.32)
by m5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
X-Received: (qmail 20358 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO n2-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com)
(98.139.170.167)
by mtaq1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
X-Received: from [66.196.81.178] by n2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with
NNFMP; 17 Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
X-Received: from [10.193.75.127] by t8.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with
NNFMP; 17 Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
Date: 17 Mar 2015 15:41:14 -0700
X-Received: from [127.0.0.1] by gapi5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17
Mar 2015 22:41:14 -0000
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="9nlWnTS9ocNmxdhsK3FKVLWiM6a5jwOaA8HvrLV"
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Yahoo-Post-EncIP: vHSxQG9-41yVGDwvNnmRbUWL2yLsgdxpYRTaeAxdvoxydfWXcQ
Subject: Barry Wright's nar-ci-fan-ta-stun-ted world
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=567158126;
y=4G9Oe1ptG3WYv8tx1UQQlH9iK-bRz2FU6Dv3pg6so01gDiotW0iSTA; email=no
X-Yahoo-Profile: ak_ak_0828
From: ak_ak_0828 <[email protected]>
---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote :
98.136.x.x are the Yahoo IPs so you can ignore those. The
X-Originating-IP field would contain the IP address if it's there and
probably only when sent via email.
On 03/18/2015 09:21 AM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I couldn't match the IP addresses in the ak_ak post header with
anything Jim has sent, but I am about to have lunch, so I didn't
try very hard. It is kind of interesting that Jim, directly
addressing Barry using the reverse_archery handle says he meant
never to interact with Barry again, but in order to send the
message directly addressed to Barry in the post, he did interact.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote :
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, <j_alexander_stanley@...>
<mailto:j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote :
What IP addresses? People who show up with the
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> email
address are anonymous, with email and IP addresses both
undisclosed. From the header info, there is no way for me, Rick,
or anyone else to determine anything about ak_ak's true identity.
Keep in mind, Sal, that this also applies to your own FFL
identity as well.
Hmmm, I've done it before successfully. Even found my own local
server. Maybe I'm wrong about this one.
---In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote :
LOL, those IP addresses sure give the game away!
