That's probably just because they haven't thought of it yet.

Sal


On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:49 AM, authfriend wrote:

Non sequitur, as I'm sure you realize.

*Any* practice that is considered to interfere with
TM practice would be a no-go.

But as you know, there is no area on the forms for
"object of devotion."

Reply via email to