Sal
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:49 AM, authfriend wrote:
Non sequitur, as I'm sure you realize.
*Any* practice that is considered to interfere with
TM practice would be a no-go.
But as you know, there is no area on the forms for
"object of devotion."
Non sequitur, as I'm sure you realize.
*Any* practice that is considered to interfere with
TM practice would be a no-go.
But as you know, there is no area on the forms for
"object of devotion."