On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:21 PM, authfriend wrote: That doesn't mean he's right, of course, but it does strongly suggest it's what he believes.
Hey, maybe Paul is a True Believer!
At this point, your initial attempt to claim Paul had "seen the light" and was no longer an admirer of MMY having crashed and burned rather spectacularly, your agenda would be a lot better served by doing a 180 and scorning Paul as a TB.
Uh, I didn't write that.
(And maybe the notion of "spiritual incest" is a crock to begin with, for reasons I've discussed extensively elsewhere, to no response from Vaj.)
If you have a hard time with the phrase, you should take it up with the spiritual abuse groups who use the phrase. I did not invent the phrase "spiritual incest", so what am I to respond to? Your denial or your confusion?
I've taken it up with you because you so obviously wholeheartedly approve of it, having used it to justify labeling MMY a "pervert."
Who invented the phrase is irrelevant. It's a nitwit notion, for reasons I've gone into at some length, as noted. And unfortunately you won't be able to show either denial or confusion in what I wrote.
Of course it's not a nitwit notion. You've obviously not met any of the men and women who were victims of spiritual incest. Very sad either way.
(Just BTW, Vaj, your judicious snipping technique may work to obscure context when you're having an exchange with someone who gets FFL by email; but you should really eschew it with those who read and respond on the Web site, who can easily go back and restore what you snipped from the earlier post. Makes you look, you know, kinda shifty.) <sigh> Get a life Judy, you obviously haven't a clue. Please see the above example of your own falacious snipping!
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
