---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote :

 
 

---In [email protected], <anartaxius@...> wrote :

 

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:58 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WHAT THE HELL? (Great Beyond Dispatch #2)
 ---In [email protected], <anartaxius@...> wrote : ---In 
[email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In 
[email protected], <anartaxius@...> wrote :
 

 

 So FFL is still the best bet to find a decent conversation,
 

 What, on the whole internet? I realize you don't get out much but this is 
rather far fetched.
 

 I am talking about spiritual groups related to TM
 

 

 I must say I'm impressed at your patience with this bullshit Xeno. But perhaps 
it's time to point out the irony in what's happening. Here we have a bunch of 
people with not much to say about anything claiming that "mean old Bawee" 
stopped them from posting because he was such a mean old meanie.
 

 And here they are pouring abuse on you in the same way they claim he used to 
get at them! I've said these people have no sense of awareness but isn't this 
taking it too far? I think that amoeba I posted about yesterday has a better 
grasp of what's going on than Ms "Back for More".
 

 Lets make a challenge out of it. If it was the Big Bad Wolf stopping 
conversations here then why haven't they started again? How come it's looking 
more like a teenage girl's facebook page every day?
 

 If you were being prevented from posting, start posting. Start a thread, say 
something interesting, tell us something we didn't know, give us an insight 
into something - anything.
 But stop this dumb harassment of Xeno, you're just making yourself look 
stupid, he's got more to say than the rest of us put together. 
 

 If you can't manage a whole thread you can share brain cells until you've 
thought of something. Better still, have a look back through the archives at 
some of Barry's pieces about creative writing. He posted some good essays on 
how to get started on the subject because, like me, he got fed up of the lack 
of participation and one line posts that add nothing that infest this place. 
 

 But any appreciation of Barry's writing and contributions about archaeology, 
travel or history or even TV reviews would be a way of admitting that he made 
up a huge part of what was worth reading. Can't have that eh? Got to paint him 
bad and use him to blame your lack of meaningful participation on.
 

 When was the last time Judy started a thread? Hell, when was the first time 
Judy started a thread!
 

 Make an effort, stop the hypocritical bullshit or this place will drown in 
bland your pap.
 

 Sally Ann, it's time to ditch your blinkers and take a good look at what you 
write and why you write it. You're so full of shit half of the time and full of 
hypocrisy the other half all the while masquerading as this know-it-all, cocky 
Brit who could have a decent sense of humour if he wasn't so invested in being 
right so much of the time. Your attempt to play your buddy's mean card just 
makes you look like a shmuck when, in fact, you sometimes have worthwhile stuff 
to say. Stick to the worthwhile, I can be friendly and why bother about me if I 
don't have anything useful to say beyond what you find on your FB page (you are 
a member of FB, why? And why blame pap on FB as "teenage girl, your misogyny is 
showing.)?
 

 At any rate, you can no more be objective about what I post than you can 
recognize your buddy as a troll. Why you're bringing Judy into this as somehow 
lacking based on her record of "thread starting" is the lamest thing I have 
seen in a while. What the hell are you saying? Carry on ignoring me, Sally, you 
are not someone who evidently has enough honesty and openness to really want 
answers or feedback to your rants.
 

 

 

 Xeno, until we removed the biggest impediment to a real conversation this 
place was being relentlessly moderated by that impediment. No one was exempt 
from his malicious and twisted lies and false allegations, not to mention 
bone-headed conclusions, except those who agreed with and stroked his ego. For 
you to assert that FFL, of all places, was "the best place to find a decent 
conversation", is perverse if not simply bizarre.
 

 It is the ideas and what you can learn from them, or make out of them, not the 
people that propose them that I find interesting. What you do not like, skip 
over or delete (if you interact by email). Perhaps all of us have had an idol 
that did not live up to the image we pretended to ourselves that they were. In 
the movement, even shortly after one started to get involved with TM, there 
were strange warning signs something was amiss, and we would ignore it. The 
main problem is human beings are never ever really a match for the ideals they 
create. Still, we can sometimes extract value out of a 
much-less-than-what-we-would-consider-ideal situation.

 

 Funny, I wrote a post about this very thing to MJ. The big difference was I 
made it personal, I used "I" a lot whereas you tend to keep things in the 
abstract. Dry and brittle, a tad pedantic; I'm hoping you weren't a teacher or 
professor in your working days - the class would have been on snooze fer sure. 
Sorry, but it's true.
 

 No, I was not a teacher or a professor, so no one had to fall asleep on my 
account. I used to live next to a professor of engineering. He would come over 
and talk for hours in a monotone. Most of the time, in 'person' I don't talk 
that much. As for an 'I', you think you are a person. Too bad, what a loss.

 

 Ho, ho, hee, hee, snort. That is fucking hilarious!! And thank you for that. 
You have seriously missed the boat, lost the thread, stumbled off the platform. 
There is no loss Xeno, you evidently misunderstood something when you became 
"enlightened" or read the wrong book or misinterpreted some sage. There is no 
"too bad" for living amid personhood. I can vouch for that. Whatever you have 
lost, you need to find it again, and soon before you leave that body of yours.
 

 It's all in the eye of the beholder, and it's 'eye', not eyes. POVs are not 
interchangeable. I have not lost anything that is real. I lost a lot of other 
stuff though. I could lose some more; it is a waste of time to seek what cannot 
be found.
 














 
 


 


 










Reply via email to