I'm worried about how cycle sensitive they are going to be. The world seems set up for motorists. I was out on my bike the other day and came up to some traffic lights which were red, so I stopped. After what seemed several lifetimes they were still red and then a car pulled up behind and they went green! The things were motion sensitive and weren't set to be triggered by a man on a bike.
What chance do we stand against driverless cars? If their sensors can pick up the narrow outline of a cyclist from behind they'll be braking at all sorts of things won't they? One hopes they've thought about this but British road planners don't take us self-propelled types into account. ---In [email protected], <anartaxius@...> wrote : Should a Driverless Car Decide Who Lives or Dies? 'Right now, ethicists have more questions than answers. Should rules governing autonomous vehicles emphasize the greater good -- the number of lives saved -- and put no value on the individuals involved?' Should a Driverless Car Decide Who Lives or Dies? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-25/should-a-driverless-car-decide-who-lives-or-dies-in-an-accident- http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-25/should-a-driverless-car-decide-who-lives-or-dies-in-an-accident- Should a Driverless Car Decide Who Lives or Dies? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-25/should-a-driverless-car-decide-who-lives-or-dies-in-an-accident- The gearheads in Detroit, Tokyo and Stuttgart have mostly figured out how to build driverless vehicles. Even the Google guys seem to have solved the riddle. View on www.bloomberg.com http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-25/should-a-driverless-car-decide-who-lives-or-dies-in-an-accident- Preview by Yahoo
