---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote :
 
 ---In [email protected], <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote :
 
 (snip)
 

 So far Doug has stonewalled us on his reasons for banning Barry. So some are 
making up their own to cover this glaring gap.
 
 





























































 Nope, that's a story *you* made up. Nobody's doing that.

Me: You are saying you know why he got bounced, I am saying I don't. I am not 
making up anything by pointing out that we have been not been given a reason. 
You already agreed to this point did you forget?

 

 Judy:When I first saw Barry's warcry of defiance--that he was going to ignore 
Doug--I thought, Whoops, he's gone too far this time; that's going to get him 
bounced. That was before we knew there was going to *be* an explanatory gap. 
And I still think that's what pushed him over the edge of Doug's tolerance.

Me: And you might just be right. If that was the reason I would object to it. 
But we haven't been given the exact reason you are guessing.

 

 Judy:Your post to me, Curtis, is flapping limply in the breeze at the moment. 
I'll get to it later this afternoon.

Me: Yeah we have some real gems to discuss, I have not forgotten I am just 
prolonging the pleasure.

 Judy: In the meantime, you might just want to look up that post of Ann's I 
mentioned so you can at least limit your embarrassment over your 
Doug-twisted-Rick's-arm story by not repeating it. (Goodness knows you don't 
have the integrity to retract it.)

Me: Overlooking the gratuitous personal shots you are taking at me, I looked 
for the post and only saw a video response and an attaboy agreement with a 
post. If it is a reason that stands on its own why don't you repeat it. 

You are trying to Judy me here, focusing on an insignificant detail that is 
really just an opinion about an inconsequential detail. I got this impression 
from Buck's months long campaign here and from communicating with Rick. And 
perhaps Rick doesn't feel as if he was dogged into this. OK, who cares? If Rick 
says that isn't how it went down OK, that is his view of it and I would accept 
that. But as Buck's rotted master used to say: "the elephant has two sets of 
teeth, one for show and one for eating. I wouldn't get too carried away on this 
extraneous point if I were you. 


 

 





Reply via email to