---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :
Yes, I've walked around inspecting the Dome several times the last few weeks. It is fine. I am not concerned. I have done that kind of work and they are doing fine. The structure is easy to work on. Some kids were around traveling with the crew but not handling or applying the material. For the type of work and type of applicator you don't necessarily need respirators. You apply it from the up wind side. The report by Karl seems overblown concern. The facilities people at the university researched options for the job and found a company that would give a 10 year guarantee on the work. The previous contractor the last time the roofing job was done is not around. Great, so there was a whole lot of hoopla about nothing then. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : As far as I can see, this thread is based entirely on unverified statements made by someone called Karl, and yet those statements are being treated as facts, leading to a bash-the-TMO fest. I don't know about the bash fest but I certainly had the thought that this one post about someone's (Karl's, presumably) concerns about carcinogenic dome materials and underage, under protected, underpaid workers is unsubstantiated at this point. It wouldn't be hard to do a little detective work in the space of 24 hours to find out if any of it is true. Certainly, if I was in FF and worried about it I would have already started finding facts out. Has anyone here done that at all? snippity snip
