On 12/27/2015 09:33 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
BTW Ollie, you're all wet behind the ears in regards to Social
Security. Every group, that I know of , that has opted out of SS has
fared far better than if they had stayed in it. One case in point is
the Galveston public employees. They currently earn about three times
what SS would pay them off of the same amount of investment. the same
goes for numerous other groups such a s Railroad employees, Postal
Workers and others.
So what do the folks in Galveston think about paying higher taxes so
that the Galveston employees can retire at full wage and benefits?
That's a scam and a half. Which was perpetrated by Wall Street to get
their hands on that money. Things could even go south by the time some
of these employees are ready to retire and they'll get nothing.
Pensions weren't originally intended to be this way.
You are aware that many boomers have taken SS earlier they they wanted
to partly to make sure they even got some of it since after all we
contributed. The other part was how badly the banksters screwed our
economy and folks who could have kept working into their 70s and have
lots of good experience can't find work anymore. Totally upside down and
The economic collapse of 2008 was due to Democratic policies made
during the Clinton years that Democratic congressmen stood in the way
of changing when it was discovered that they were creating problems.
Case in point, in 2001 Bush and later John McCain warned of the
problems within the Community Redevelopment Act that was causing
problems and that Fannie Mae wouldn't be able to handle it. Jesse
Jackson and perhaps Al Sharpton were putting pressure on banks to get
poor people into their own houses. Banks reluctantly made the loans
and bundled them and passed them on to other risk takers, eventually
ending up with Fannie Mae that then collapsed. Barny Frank had been
warned there was a problem looming and refused to allow any
adjustments to made. The housing market collapsed then the banks
failed that were involved in extending the risky loans.
So what flavor kool-aid is Fox News mixing up these days? Maybe there
needs to be an AA group for Fox News addicts. Your information is so
wrong and polluted I don't know where to begin. Take it history wasn't
one of your better subjects.
*From:* "Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2015 10:08 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why the Trumpies hate the Media
Raul Castro? Is this some kind of straw man argument? Your entire
Democratic party is advocating socialism without using the word.
Bernzie being the exception. They all want the same thing, total
government control by taxation or regulation.
Obama and Clinton are only centrists from a Bernzie Sander's point of
You're not in favor of *handouts* but.... we don't hand out enough. Right!
Quite frankly, it's cheaper to do business over seas than the US due
to government regulation, taxation and union demands, more Democratic
*From:* "olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2015 7:04 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why the Trumpies hate the Media
"the far left"??!? As in similar in political outlook to say, Raul
Castro of Cuba?? And who, exactly, in the US Government, has
advocated, or worse, acted on, such an ideological vision? I am pretty
confident I can wait here for days without a name from you, even down
to the level of city dogcatcher, because *they don't exist*.
Obama is a centrist, like Clinton was. The only difference is the
color of his skin. His concern over the demise of social programs is
well founded, when our previous President advocated the destruction of
Social Security. "Put it all in the stock market", he and his cronies
said, and he would have, but he had no mandate from Congress. A good
thing, as we would have had millions in the street when the market
I am not in favor of handouts, but the current Republican domestic
philosophy, and tax policy, seems to be, "I got mine, screw you",
justified on the basis of some waste and corruption wrt social
services programs. A very cold-hearted way of thinking, and obviously
biased when no such scrutiny is applied to say, military programs, or
The Republicans scream about losing American jobs, while advocating
constantly for ways to ship jobs overseas. It is ironic that the only
thing keeping our economy afloat are all the cheap products from
China, the Far Left, Communist nation, on which our continued
prosperity depends. Calling Obama "far left" is quite funny from that
perspective, as it is the Republicans who are driving us further into
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
Ollie, you make an awful lot of assumptions here. You assume that,
because a person in congress opposes the policies of the *far left*,
that they are racist and that they oppose those policies because the
person implementing them has dark skin. How simple minded can you get?
If you are white, I would have to believe that you are seriously
suffering from *white guilt* and trying to absolve yourself by
leveling such a charge.Next year, the excuses will be that we need a
*woman* to lead the country and if elected and she faces any
resistance, it will be because she's female in a patriarchal society.
This is meant to appeal to the base instincts of the *low information*
voter, an appeal to the emotions of the ignorant.
Damn the fact that these very policies have driven poverty higher
than ever, that black unemployment levels are the highest in decades,
more people are on government assistance than ever. Damn the fact that
our current president has more than doubled the national debt of all
other presidents before him with nothing to show for it, that we owe
much of that debt to China. That money generating businesses are
leaving our country in droves.
Damn the fact that he threw hard fought, won and costly victories back
to our enemies that has embolden them, That our once stable allies
don't trust the word of our leaders. That once dangerous terrorists
that had been locked up have been returned to the battle field to
continue killing again.
Damn the fact that he opens our borders to whoever wants to come
here, without due process, driving down wages for our own citizens,
while subsidizing the substandard wages of the * illegal immigrants*
with government social program hand outs that cost all other tax payers.
Damn the fact that because of him, the people have put more
Republicans in office than any time since the end of the civil war
with nothing to show for it because they fear being labeled *racist*
and give him just about anything he wants including another trillion
dollar plus budget this year.
Ollie, you have got to be kidding me! You are one of these low
information voters that have drunk the Kool-aide. Of course, any one
with a brain can figure out that the purpose of these policies is to
bring about a complete collapse of the current social and economic
system in place and replacing it with the purest form of socialism
which will not redistribute wealth but redistribute poverty and
suffering. Be careful of what you wish for. The *right* is armed and
dangerous and will only tolerate so much of the left's shenanigans.
This is exactly the mindset, the one that you voice here, that scares
the bejeebers out of me, Mike. Add that to the fact that you claim
those "on the right" are "armed and dangerous" isn't lessening this
feeling I have. That's all America needs, is a bunch of Kool Aid drunk
right wingers emerging from their villages with flaming torches,
pitchforks and no teeth (thanks to unaffordable health and dental) and
screaming for banishment of those seeking asylum in the US and to rid
the country of "socialistic" programs. You live in a dreamworld, Mike.
Not one thing you say here is, I believe, true but it sure gives me a
glimpse into one mindset present day US residents have and it is fear
*From:* "olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, December 26, 2015 4:03 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Why the Trumpies hate the Media
Please put me on your list too. Barack Obama is one of our better
Presidents. I find it appalling that the many racists in the US
Congress see fit to obstruct him, simply because of the color of his
skin. Anyway, just for you old white racists, I would LOVE it if we
had another black man (or a black woman for a change) for President,
only this time, two black parents, and that beautiful dark, dark skin
and full lips. I hope whomever it is, they give you a big bear hug, a
wet kiss on the cheek, and knock that silly pillow case off your
pointed little head.
Merry Christmas to you, and in the TRUE spirit of Jesus Christ, May
God Bless Barack Hussein Obama!!!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emptybill@...> wrote :
*/Someone's "principle political view" is irrelevant if their
/**That iswhat shills like**//**Oprah claimed about “The One”. Only he
was /not/ presented as a “stinking personhood” but rather as a
unifying saint. *
*This is why Em’ likes him … wondrous /Barack Osama/, the great
divider. He is the epitomee of the political liar – promising to unite
all while following the plan of Saul Alinsky (Radical Marxist/Apostate
*/“Lest we /**/forget/**/at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment
to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and
history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history
begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who
rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he
at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”/*
*/“What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it
is to what they believe it should be. The Prince
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prince> was written by Machiavelli
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niccol%C3%B2_Machiavelli> for the Haves
on how to hold power. /**Rules for Radicals**/is written for the
Have-Nots on how to take it away."/*
*/Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky/***
*Chanukistani proly double votes … both Canadian and US elections.
What do you expect from a dual? Em’ proly votes for whomever sounds
most neo-Marxist. *
*I say - /hypocrite swine/ … give up your possessions and give it all
away. Problem is the swine only want to give away other people’s
rights and possessions. *
*Don’t worry though - Hillary will show them! *
*After all, she’s a self-professed lover of Alinsky too. *