Yes, as I say, I'm sure she's addressed this seeming double standard. Just hadn't heard it for some reason.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Didn't she say something like *All women should be believed when they accuse some one of a sexual attack on them"? Yet, she managed the bimbo irruptions against Bill by attacking the women she said should be believed. I remember when the poppa Bush first ran against Bill. He brought up an issue of *character* that nobody in the media said was important. Hillary has given more ammunition for perpetual investigation, if elected, than Bill ever did. Bill was simply a rapist and pervert, so embarrassing that nobody wanted to believe it or dwell on it. Hillary has endangered national security for her convenience and lies about it. From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 7:36 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Did Hillary Clinton Make a Strategic Mistake? The other perceived weak spot for Hillary might be Bill and his carrying on with other women. Now, for the record, I look for leadership qualities in a president, and care far less about his, (or her) proclivities in a certain direction. But, what I've been wanting to hear, and, I'm sure she's addressed it, is how can she be such a advocate for women's rights and been on the wrong side of the issue with Bill's accusers. Or, at least she's been accused of working to discredit Bill's accusers. I'd appreciate to hear what others might say on this subject. (-:
