---In [email protected], <steve.sundur@...> wrote :
Well, taken at face value, the implication is, "I am not influenced by big money pouring into my campaign, but the same can't be said for my opponents" In other words, a rather elitist proclamation. Actually, I think everyone, (speaking of commentators, and those watching them) had a grand time discussing the debate points and replaying the comments of those two old timers slugging it out, making references to people and events 50, 60 years ago! I believe the consensus was, that Hillary carried the day. I disagree. I don't think either of them bested the other except, and this is a big one, when Hillary went in for the 'low blow" with regard to Sander's purported "disappointment" with the current President and his supposed feelings that Obama was "weak". I thought this little diatribe of hers at the end of the debate was so clearly motivated by less-than-respect-worthy intentions and I thought Hillary looked the lesser for it. Other than that, I feel deeply about both candidates with regard to their passion for taking on the thankless job of being President. And when compared to listening to the blatherings of the GOP candidates both Bernie and Hillary sound positively genius and saint-like. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/12/hillary-clinton/did-bernie-sanders-call-president-barack-obama-wea/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/12/hillary-clinton/did-bernie-sanders-call-president-barack-obama-wea/ ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : I imagine she'd expect you to answer that for yourself (if you even really needed to ask the question): She's not the only one receiving big money. ---In [email protected], <steve.sundur@...> wrote : Hillary says we've got to get the big money out of politics. But then says, the big money that contributes to her political campaign have no influence. So, why go after the big money in politics? Hillary?
