This mainstream Christian blogger takes a swipe at Paul Tillich's "Ground of Being", saying that it (Being-IIn-Itself" can't be BOTH Immanent AND Transcendent.
Actually, It can if we are to believe MMY and to the extent of our own experiences with TM. The fact that it doesn't "seem" possible doesn't make it impossible. Of course, Shankara would have a lot to say on the subject of Advaitic Monism. When the blogger says we can have both Immanence and Transcendence at the same time, he simply has revealed a genuine Paradox (of which there are many in logic). http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/12/the-impossible-god-of-paul-tillich/ http://www.patheos.com/blogs/camelswithhammers/2011/12/the-impossible-god-of-paul-tillich/
