Wrong think, wrong take. Again. You appear to believe that no fault whatsoever may be found with Obama if one wants to avoid being characterized as never having forgiven him for beating Hillary. You might want to have a rethink on that one (especially given that this particular criticism wasn't mine but that of Charles Pierce).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : I think what's coming through is that you've never forgiven Obama for taking on Hillary and beating her. That's my take on this. (-: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : David Axelrod never forgave Hillary for staying till the end in the primary race with Obama in 2008. Charles Pierce of Esquire has said he thinks Axelrod is "on a one-way train to Pat Cadell Land." Of Axelrod's recent tweet, Pierce writes: Of course, almost 25 years of Clinton coverage would indicate this to be complete hogwash, but there you are. And this is fairly rich coming from a guy who helped produce an administration that has had deeply important transparency problems of its own, pursuing whistleblowers to the ends of the earth. FDR, JFK, HRC: Presidential Health Is a Historically Tricky Topic http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48520/hillary-health-issues/ http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48520/hillary-health-issues/ FDR, JFK, HRC: Presidential Health Is a Historically Tri... http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48520/hillary-health-issues/ Also: Grover Cleveland. View on www.esquire.com http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48520/hillary-health-issues/ Preview by Yahoo IOW, Axelrod is a hypocrite, and he's just as susceptible to picking up the right-wing Hillary smears as everybody else. He fits perfectly into my description, plus he has his own personal reasons for his Hillary Derangement Syndrome. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : where on the sliding scale of finding fault, do David Axelod's comments fall? he doesn't very well fit in that description you have below. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Actually, this has been been the common wisdom, reported endlessly in the media, for quite some time now. It's infuriating, because the reasons people tend to have for disliking Hillary are largely bogus, the product of the malicious, decades-long right-wing campaign to destroy her (and Bill). ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : A small distinction, which may, or may not help. It's not that anyone is so much "for" Trumpster, but rather they dislike Hillary so much. That's just what I've picked up from the hinterlands.