---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :
Corrupt because Byrne, at least, said things that weren't true: Secret Service veterans denounce anti-Clinton tell-all book http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578 http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578 Secret Service veterans denounce anti-Clinton tell-al... http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578 Former agents blasted writer Gary Byrne for having "underlying motives." View on www.politico.com http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578 Preview by Yahoo The Arkansas state troopers? You have to be kidding. Those stories have been debunked. The troopers were paid by right-wingers to make up and pass on gossipy tales about the Clintons. And Byrne doesn't need job security, since he is a *former* agent. But according to the high-ranking former agents (who don't need job security either) who have denounced him, he wasn't in a position to see what he reported in the book; his rank wasn't high enough. From the Politico article: The closest contact that Byrne could have had, according to Gilhooly and others, is seeing the president or the first lady pass in the hallway — far from the intimate access he would have needed to catch Bill Clinton in the act or see Hillary Clinton fly into the cursing rages he now writes have convinced him that she doesn’t have the “integrity and temperament” to be president. Oh, and the Clintons have never had anybody "bumped off." No, declaring victory doesn't make me victorious. What makes me victorious is exposing the parrot vomit right-wingers enjoy spewing for what it is. This is what I find so interesting (read disgusted) is how so many simply read one thing and they jump wholeheartedly on the bandwagon repeating the falsehoods everywhere they go. It's like what I see on FB all the time - someone posts a link to an article and they're all enraged and indignant and you get 20 people jumping on the outrage wagon and then I come along and debunk it by simply looking into it a little further and -voila! I either get blocked or they acknowledge their lazy-ass approach to believing everything they read. I tend to find Trump supporters are more likely to fall into the above category as you watch them, open-mouthed and believing, as their great 'leader' yells lie after lie from his pulpit. Here is a funny clip, although most likely parody: The Daily Show - Videos | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/videos https://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/videos The Daily Show - Videos | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/videos The Daily Show. 5,883,757 likes · 2,463,497 talking about this · 5,026 were here. Weeknights at 11/10c and on the Comedy Central App Get free ... View on www.facebook.com https://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/videos Preview by Yahoo http://www.salon.com/2015/08/05/the_daily_show_finally_reveals_the_truth_about_those_insane_correspondent_interviews/ http://www.salon.com/2015/08/05/the_daily_show_finally_reveals_the_truth_about_those_insane_correspondent_interviews/ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Right, one corrupt former agent whom the rest of the service repudiates. No, there are at least two books out there by former SS agents. Corrupt? Why, because they told all? Don't forget the State Troopers that were bodyguards in Arkansas. From Ronald Kesslers book First Family Details: "When in public,Hillary smiles and acts graciously." Kessler explains, "As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness and imperiousness become evident". He added: "Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi." He said she is rude to SS and others, cussed Secret Service drivers, never said *thank you* .He goes on and on. BTW, it wasn't the *rest* of the Secret Service that repudiated Gary Byrne. It was a few high ranking members that denied his book, much of which he got was from other agents.I would think telling all on the Clintons would not be good for job security. Might be difficult to bump -off a Srecret Service agent though. Repudiating those that do *tell all* would be job security. Sorry Judy, declaring victory doesn't make you victorious. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good You are really not doing so well, Mike. Your attempted comebacks are getting weaker and weaker. You know how psittacines regurgitate their food when they get a crop infection? The regurgitated material is a disgusting slimy mass. Same with parroted slime from the right wing. It's truly repulsive and a symptom of serious illness. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Oh yes, the Secret Service is especially fond of looking out for her! From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good That's only in public. Just about without exception, everyone who has worked with her (including Republicans) says she's warm and caring and funny and charming and exceptionally likeable. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : She has to look *likeable*, which she is not. That's like asking nurse Ratchet to look and act likeable. From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] It's Looking Good ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> wrote : (snip) There’s really only one way Hillary could lose this debate IMO, and that’s if she pulls a Gore and tried to play down her own massive intelligence and experience in an attempt to make Trump look smarter than he is. Why anyone would do that is of course the big question, which I’m sure still leaves psychologists scratching their heads about Gore and his first debate to this day. Gore wasn't so much trying to make Bush look smarter. Gore had been brutally mocked for being too wonkish and was portrayed as stiff and boring, and he was attempting to counter that image. Hillary actually has a similar problem. She needs to come across as human and charming as well as intelligent and experienced. Not fair, but that's the way it is. At this point I think all the debates are striving to do is capture the approval and votes of all of those independents and/or former Bernie supporters who are leaning towards Jill or Gary. The Hillary supporters are going to stay Hillary supporters and Trump supporters are going to keep enabling a sociopath no matter what happens at the debates. It would take some sort of miracle for Trump's base to abandon him. It will be very interesting to see what happens and how the polls are effected after the debate based on performance. That should give us a hint as to how important the debates are and how many undecideds there actually are/were out there pre-debate.