Nope, wrong again. You were spoiling for a fight. You chose your cause and your opponents badly. You argued badly. You lost badly. And you followed up badly, pretending YOU had won, with meaningless, empty insults, unable to respond to any of the argument you had decided to start because you were craving attention.
Now I'm just going to leave you to stew in your own juice. P.S.: You might want to look up the term "outlier" in Mr. Dictionary. I don't think you know what it means. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : Ah, the ceremonial planting of the imaginary flag of victory. Since we see this so often, I really think you should consider adding some production values. You know some music and video to go along with it: Judy in a toga. Judy in renaissance garb. Judy wearing a coon skin cap. Judy in a business suit, with the heading, "I Win" Now, probably you should have a scroll on the bottom, "Past performance does not guarantee future results", or something like that. Just in case. You know. Whaddya think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : You are very unconvincing, Stevie-poo. You've screwed up badly on the Trump topic, and it's painfully obvious you have no idea how to recoup. Sad. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : As I've said repeatedly Ms. Judy, you are an outlier with nothing interesting to say, or offer. Should you be able to be able to overcome this deficiency, I would be glad to engage you in some discourse. Until such time, I'm afraid you will have to remain a source of amusement, and nothing else. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Sure, Stevie-poo. That's why you can't come up with any kind of response. You have no response to Sal either. I'd say it's you who does the falling short. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : you keep falling short, Judy of the needed threshold. but by all means, keep trying ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Be interesting to know what his wife would think of his performance here today, wouldn't it? I guess she must be used to his hypocrisy, misogyny, and general lack of integrity by now, though. As well as his complete inability to acknowledge, let alone deal with, any kind of criticism, including refutation of his falsehoods. No wonder he's a Trump fan. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> wrote : It's unbelievable isn't it...some video featuring Trump bragging about committing assault comes out, yet it's HILLARY who needs to apologize and/or explain herself. It's the ultimate in male privilege and misogyny. It's not Trump who has to answer after admitting to assault, it's Hillary who must now answer for something someone else (who's not on the ticket, last time I looked) did. It's pathetic. It's the ultimate in desperation. Sal On Oct 8, 2016, at 6:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: You've wriggled yourself so deep into the muck and discredited yourself so thoroughly, Stevie-poo, you're never going to be able to crawl out. Your attempt to change the subject from Trump to Hillary is the ultimate in hypocrisy. Your whole intention here is to distract attention from Trump's gross misbehavior by attacking Hillary. Why you think nobody will notice what you're doing is incomprehensible. You aren't supporting her, you're supporting him. In another post, you claim Hillary headed a task force to discredit Bill's accusers. You made that up out of whole cloth. Or you're regurgitating garbage you've swallowed from some right-wing Web site or Facebook page. You're also assuming that all the accusations made against Bill were truthful, another right-wing meme. There was and still is good reason to be skeptical of many if not most of them--but you believe Hillary should just have accepted them all uncomplainingly as true or be convicted of hypocrisy. Your thinking is unbelievably twisted. It's sick. This discussion is about Trump, not Hillary, no matter how hard you try to pretend otherwise. But here's some information about Hillary. You won't read it, of course, but maybe others will be interested in learning some actual facts, as well as understanding what we don't know: How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton’s Infidelity, and His Accusers http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton’s Infidel... http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign used aggressive tactics to combat claims about his extramarital conduct. Here is a look at Mrs. Clinton’s role. View on www.nytimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html Preview by Yahoo Quotes from the article: Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort [to discredit Bill's accusers], as described in interviews, internal campaign records and archives, is still the subject of debate. By some accounts, she gave the green light and was a motivating force; by others, her support was no more than tacit assent.... Her campaign also released statements from James Carville, Mr. Clinton’s top campaign strategist, and two lawyers who worked for Mr. Clinton, saying that Mrs. Clinton had not overseen the counterattacks. “Those who took the lead in responding to those attacks at the time have plainly stated that Hillary Clinton did not direct their work,” [her spokesman, Brian] Fallon said. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : I mean, below are questions you might hear in a court of law, and which no one here, among the Hillary supporters seems willing to answer. 1) Did Hillary Clinton attempt to discredit the women who accused Bill Clinton,her husband, of rape and sexual harassment? 2) Does Hillary Clinton claim to be a champion of women's rights? Two simple questions that Hillary supporters, cannot, or will not answer. Okay, for the record, I believe Hillary Clinton will make a better president than Donald Trump, and I will not be voting for Donald Trump. I am not trying to snare anyone, I am just curious is anyone here among the ardent HC supports has the guts to answer these questions. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : And yet once again, it is beyond someone's ability to acknowledge that their candidate has been shown to be hypocritical. In this case for how they handled the issue of accusations of rape and sexual harassment. Hillary attempted to discredit Bill's accusers for purposes of political expediency. It is a matter of public record, but many here won't go near it. Their only defense is that Trump is much worse. Does that sound like much of defense? Would that work in a court of law? "Well your honor, much worse crimes were committed on the day by client robbed someone. There were several homicides that day, so I hope you will consider that in your sentencing, or even forget it altogether." Steve-y! You have used this defense more than once here and every time I call you on it. LOL. And then, of course, anyone who points out this hypocrisy is then tagged one of the usual labels: apologist, right wing extremest. This is political correctness run amok. This is what gives rise to someone like Trump who will often tell it like it is. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> wrote : I’d say the stain has been there on anybody who defended this pile of human waste at all after the mocking-the-disabled-reporter scenario. I realize what he did, disgusting as it was, wasn’t illegal. It simply threw into stark relief that Trump is not “normal” in any sense, doesn’t have the normal empathy for his fellow humans most of us have, empathy for anyone other than his children, and I’m not even so sure about them. Certainly it doesn’t exist for anyone else in his family (For anyone who needs further proof of this, look up what he did to his great nephew who was born with serious disabilities). So IMO that ship sailed long ago. Anyone still defending him after this latest debacle must agree with him on some level, or their hatred of Hillary runs so deep they can no longer think rationally. For anyone who STILL doesn’t “get it” this is NOT the lesser of two evils meme so many of you like to trot out, this IS evil, staring you right in the face. How does it look? There is no low that is too low for the apologists here. Sal On Oct 7, 2016, at 9:55 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: You do realize, don't you, boys, that what Trump was boasting about on that tape was not just misogyny, not just crude locker-room talk, but *criminal sexual assault*. In many if not most states, kissing someone or touching their genital area without their consent is sexual battery, punishable by jail time. The flaccidity of your attempted defense of the presidential candidate you support would be hilarious if it weren't such a vile manifestation of rape culture. You can't come back from this. It's a permanent stain on your character. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : And we have had no saints as President. People loved JFK but he had secret affairs. The public can be sooooo lame! On 10/07/2016 06:45 PM, anon_alias wrote:
