She is, batshit crazy, and no description has ever been as apt in describing a person.
But that is what happens when blind spots are not addressed. And it brings up something you alluded to before. Can meditation by itself effect positive changes in people? I say no, and that inner work is essential. As a case in point, we have the personality in question. However, one could say, "well, where would she be without it" Hmmmm. Don't know. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : Jooday would do Goebbels proud! On 10/09/2016 11:07 AM, anon_alias wrote: You lie every time you defend Hillary's lies. You seem to be in denial. Just once I'd like to see you be honest about Hillary Clinton. By not acknowledging her lies and falsehoods, you become her enabler. Instead of calling Steve a liar, why don't you admit that you are covering for Hillary's lying? That makes you a liar for withholding important information. You used to be honest - what happened? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote : No, no. As you well know, I don't lie. Only the liars here ever say I lie--and they're lying. And you still don't know what "outlier" means. Stew, stew, stew, Stevie-poo. Put a fork in you. You're done. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote : This of course, is your boiler plate. You have some utility as someone to toy with, but not much else. As regards, "outlier", I will say instead that you have outed yourself as, really, a first class liar. Even declared it regularly. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote : Nope, wrong again. You were spoiling for a fight. You chose your cause and your opponents badly. You argued badly. You lost badly. And you followed up badly, pretending YOU had won, with meaningless, empty insults, unable to respond to any of the argument you had decided to start because you were craving attention. Now I'm just going to leave you to stew in your own juice. P.S.: You might want to look up the term "outlier" in Mr. Dictionary. I don't think you know what it means. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote : Ah, the ceremonial planting of the imaginary flag of victory. Since we see this so often, I really think you should consider adding some production values. You know some music and video to go along with it: Judy in a toga. Judy in renaissance garb. Judy wearing a coon skin cap. Judy in a business suit, with the heading, "I Win" Now, probably you should have a scroll on the bottom, "Past performance does not guarantee future results", or something like that. Just in case. You know. Whaddya think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote : You are very unconvincing, Stevie-poo. You've screwed up badly on the Trump topic, and it's painfully obvious you have no idea how to recoup. Sad. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote : As I've said repeatedly Ms. Judy, you are an outlier with nothing interesting to say, or offer. Should you be able to be able to overcome this deficiency, I would be glad to engage you in some discourse. Until such time, I'm afraid you will have to remain a source of amusement, and nothing else. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote : Sure, Stevie-poo. That's why you can't come up with any kind of response. You have no response to Sal either. I'd say it's you who does the falling short. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote : you keep falling short, Judy of the needed threshold. but by all means, keep trying ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote : Be interesting to know what his wife would think of his performance here today, wouldn't it? I guess she must be used to his hypocrisy, misogyny, and general lack of integrity by now, though. As well as his complete inability to acknowledge, let alone deal with, any kind of criticism, including refutation of his falsehoods. No wonder he's a Trump fan. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <salsunshineiniowa@...> mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... wrote : It's unbelievable isn't it...some video featuring Trump bragging about committing assault comes out, yet it's HILLARY who needs to apologize and/or explain herself. It's the ultimate in male privilege and misogyny. It's not Trump who has to answer after admitting to assault, it's Hillary who must now answer for something someone else (who's not on the ticket, last time I looked) did. It's pathetic. It's the ultimate in desperation. Sal On Oct 8, 2016, at 6:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: You've wriggled yourself so deep into the muck and discredited yourself so thoroughly, Stevie-poo, you're never going to be able to crawl out. Your attempt to change the subject from Trump to Hillary is the ultimate in hypocrisy. Your whole intention here is to distract attention from Trump's gross misbehavior by attacking Hillary. Why you think nobody will notice what you're doing is incomprehensible. You aren't supporting her, you're supporting him. In another post, you claim Hillary headed a task force to discredit Bill's accusers. You made that up out of whole cloth. Or you're regurgitating garbage you've swallowed from some right-wing Web site or Facebook page. You're also assuming that all the accusations made against Bill were truthful, another right-wing meme. There was and still is good reason to be skeptical of many if not most of them--but you believe Hillary should just have accepted them all uncomplainingly as true or be convicted of hypocrisy. Your thinking is unbelievably twisted. It's sick. This discussion is about Trump, not Hillary, no matter how hard you try to pretend otherwise. But here's some information about Hillary. You won't read it, of course, but maybe others will be interested in learning some actual facts, as well as understanding what we don't know: How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton’s Infidelity, and His Accusers http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html"; class="ygrps-yiv-1966767481ygrps-yiv-223365175ygrps-yiv-1227023981ygrps-yiv-50568396ygrps-yiv-1428413845ygrps-yiv-1510135424ygrps-yiv-1400521207ygrps-yiv-829690204ygrps-yiv-1440972675ygrps-yiv-1257422104ygrps-yiv-1455184730link-enhancr-card-urlWrapper ygrps-yiv-1966767481ygrps-yiv-223365175ygrps-yiv-1227023981ygrps-yiv-50568396ygrps-yiv-1428413845ygrps-yiv-1510135424ygrps-yiv-1400521207ygrps-yiv-829690204ygrps-yiv-1440972675ygrps-yiv-1257422104ygrps-yiv-1455184730link-enhancr-element How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton’s Infidel... Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign used aggressive tactics to combat claims about his extramarital conduct. Here is a look at Mrs. Clinton’s role. View on www.nytimes.com Preview by Yahoo Quotes from the article: Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort [to discredit (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
