like I was saying, "blinds spots".  They'll kill ya, if you're not careful.  (-:

---In, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 You liars who say I lie keep forgetting that nobody has ever been able to make 
the charge stick, despite years of trying on the liars' part. 

 When you accuse someone of lying, you need to be able to document it. You 
can't do that with me, because there are no examples of my having lied.



 ---In, <noozguru@...> wrote :

 Jooday would do Goebbels proud!
 On 10/09/2016 11:07 AM, anon_alias wrote:
   You lie every time you defend Hillary's lies. You seem to be in denial. Just 
once I'd like to see you be honest about Hillary Clinton. By not acknowledging 
her lies and falsehoods, you become her enabler. 
 Instead of calling Steve a liar, why don't you admit that you are covering for 
Hillary's lying? That makes you a liar for withholding important information. 
You used to be honest - what happened?
<authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 No, no. As you well know, I don't lie. Only the liars here ever say I lie--and 
they're lying. 
 And you still don't know what "outlier" means.
 Stew, stew, stew, Stevie-poo. Put a fork in you. You're done.
<steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote :

 This of course, is your boiler plate. You have some utility as someone to toy 
with, but not much else. 
 As regards, "outlier", I will say instead that you have outed yourself as, 
really, a first class liar.
 Even declared it regularly.
<authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 Nope, wrong again. 
 You were spoiling for a fight. You chose your cause and your opponents badly. 
You argued badly. You lost badly. And you followed up badly, pretending YOU had 
won, with meaningless, empty insults, unable to respond to any of the argument 
you had decided to start because you were craving attention.
 Now I'm just going to leave you to stew in your own juice.
 P.S.: You might want to look up the term "outlier" in Mr. Dictionary. I don't 
think you know what it means.
<steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote :

 Ah, the ceremonial planting of the imaginary flag of victory.  Since we see 
this so often, I really think you should consider adding some production 
values.  You know some music and video to go along with it: Judy in a toga.  
Judy in renaissance garb. Judy wearing a coon skin cap.  Judy in a business 
suit, with the heading, "I Win" 
 Now, probably you should have a scroll on the bottom, "Past  performance does 
not guarantee future results", or something like that.  Just in case.  You know.
 Whaddya think?
<authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 You are very unconvincing, Stevie-poo. You've screwed up badly on the Trump 
topic, and it's painfully obvious you have no idea how to recoup. Sad. 
<steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote :
 As I've said repeatedly Ms. Judy, you are an outlier with nothing interesting 
to say, or offer. Should you be able to be able to overcome this deficiency, I 
would be glad to engage you in some discourse.  Until such time, I'm afraid you 
will have to remain a source of amusement, and nothing else.
<authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 Sure, Stevie-poo. That's why you can't come up with any kind of response. You 
have no response to Sal either. I'd say it's you who does the falling short. 
<steve.sundur@...> mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote :
 you keep falling short, Judy of the needed threshold.  but by all means, keep 
<authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 Be interesting to know what his wife would think of his performance here 
today, wouldn't it? I guess she must be used to his hypocrisy, misogyny, and 
general lack of integrity by now, though. As well as his complete inability to 
acknowledge, let alone deal with, any kind of criticism, including refutation 
of his falsehoods. 
 No wonder he's a Trump fan.
<salsunshineiniowa@...> mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... wrote :
 It's unbelievable isn't it...some video featuring Trump bragging about 
committing assault comes out, yet it's HILLARY who needs to apologize and/or 
explain herself.  It's the ultimate in male privilege and misogyny.

 It's not Trump who has to answer after admitting to assault, it's Hillary who 
must now answer for something someone else (who's not on the ticket, last time 
I looked) did.

 It's pathetic.  It's the ultimate in desperation.


 On Oct 8, 2016, at 6:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife] <> wrote:
 You've wriggled yourself so deep into the muck and discredited yourself so 
thoroughly, Stevie-poo, you're never going to be able to crawl out. 
 Your attempt to change the subject from Trump to Hillary is the ultimate in 
hypocrisy. Your whole intention here is to distract attention from Trump's 
gross misbehavior by attacking Hillary. Why you think nobody will notice what 
you're doing is incomprehensible. You aren't supporting her, you're supporting 
 In another post, you claim Hillary headed a task force to discredit Bill's 
accusers. You made that up out of whole cloth. Or you're regurgitating garbage 
you've swallowed from some right-wing Web site or Facebook page.
 You're also assuming that all the accusations made against Bill were truthful, 
another right-wing meme. There was and still is good reason to be skeptical of 
many if not most of them--but you believe Hillary should just have accepted 
them all uncomplainingly as true or be convicted of hypocrisy.
 Your thinking is unbelievably twisted. It's sick.
 This discussion is about Trump, not Hillary, no matter how hard you try to 
pretend otherwise. But here's some information about Hillary.
 You won't read it, of course, but maybe others will be interested in learning 
some actual facts, as well as understanding what we don't know:

 How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton’s Infidelity, and His Accusers"; 
 How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton’s Infidel... Bill Clinton’s 
1992 presidential campaign used aggressive tactics to combat claims about his 
extramarital conduct. Here is a look at Mrs. Clinton’s role.

 View on 
 Preview by Yahoo 


 Quotes from the article:

 Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort [to discredit 

(Message over 64 KB, truncated) 

Reply via email to