As you know, the objections to what Trump said on that tape are not to his potty mouth, so if Hillary does have a potty mouth (doubtful, considering the sources), it's irrelevant.
Bringing up irrelevancies and pretending they're meaningful, as you do all the time, is just another form of lying. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : Thanks, but you are supposed to read the book BEFORE you post your own own comments. So, I think I'll take the secret service guy's word for it - why would he lie about what happened? She probably does have potty mouth! The only relevance here is that you didn't inform us that Hillary is foul-mouthed and disrespectful to the secret service, so that makes you a liar by omission. We just want the truth about Hillary Clinton, which for some reason, you refuse to reveal. Maybe that's because you don't know her or even very much about her, since obviously you've never met her or even read a single book about her. Works cited: Inside the White House by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 America Evita by Christopher Anderson, p.90 The First Partner by Joyce Milton p. 25 Unlimited Access by Gary Aldridge p.139 The Truth about Hillary by Edward Klein, p. 5 Dereliction of Duty by Robert Patterson p. 71-72 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : As you know, the objections to what Trump said on that tape are not to his potty mouth, so if Hillary does have a potty mouth (doubtful, considering the sources), it's irrelevant. Bringing up irrelevancies and pretending they're meaningful, as you do all the time, is just another form of lying. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : It's also kind of weird that you would lie by omission. You failed to point out that Hillary has quite a potty mouth. Go figure. "When men swear like sailors, it’s crude and vulgar. When women do it, it’s empowering!" - Glenn Reynolds http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/if_you_think_donald_trumps_comments_are_vulgar_check_out_hillarys_potty_mouth.html http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/if_you_think_donald_trumps_comments_are_vulgar_check_out_hillarys_potty_mouth.html ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : As I pointed out, quoting from a New York Times report, there's considerable dispute about how much Hillary had to do with any effort to threaten and intimidate these women. She certainly didn't do any threatening or intimidating herself. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : And his wife threatened and intimidated these women. Hillary was/is Bill Clinton's *enabler*. BTW, one of those women was a twelve year old girl when she was raped and Hillary defended the guy, getting him off on a technicality, as well as accusing the girl of practically *wanting it*, that she fantasized about having sex with older men. This is a very misleading description, as you know. More importantly, it seems you don't believe in the constitutional principle that everyone accused of a crime has a right to counsel. It's the duty of that counsel to give the accused the best possible defense. The counsel doesn't get to slack off on the defense because he or she suspects the accused is guilty. But ignoring the Constitution is one of the traits of the candidate you support. From: feste37 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 8:34 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A picture is worth a thousand words Newsflash for Mike: Bill Clinton is not on the ballot this year. He left office nearly 16 years ago. It's his WIFE who is running for president. Her name is Hillary. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : http://www.drudgereport.com/?3284823 http://www.drudgereport.com/?3284823 DRUDGE REPORT 2016® http://www.drudgereport.com/?3284823 Some of Bill Clinton's accusers.
