I've heard that talk can get pretty crude and often does in the estrogen
filled locker rooms. :-D
The fascist media coverage of the Presidential campaign is very
Shakespearean: much ado about nothing.
On 10/14/2016 10:30 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bill's accusers came forward immediately. Trumps, as many as thirty
years later in the middle of a political campaign with media bending
over backwards, trying to discredit him. Hillary can't win on merit or
accomplishments and has high negativity rating. All she can do is find
a way to make Trump look more negative than her.
Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around
many men in a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude
at times and usually does.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* feste37 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question
I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's
accusers are, of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of
similar things are "horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that
he himself said that he did those things to women. So they are merely
confirming the truth of his words.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :
So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill
Clinton's accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same
thing he accuses his opponent of? I haven't seen this point made
anywhere in the media yet. What the hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
