On 11/22/2016 09:23 AM, Archer Angel archonan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Transcendentalism and Quietism have philosophically at their basis, withdrawal.

That is a recessive quality, a retreat, and that cannot stand up to more forceful attitudes such as ramming a dogma down someone's throat.

Quietism was condemned as a heresy in the Catholic Church, wrongly elevating contemplation over meditation, intellectual stillness over vocal prayer, and interior passivity over pious action. (Note the words here are used in a different sense than in TM.)

This problem cannot be overcome unless it is realized that transcendence and stillness are techniques to expand experience, to expand the nature of the mind. They are not ends in themselves, they are methods.

Also these methods become objectified. Moving from a state of experience not previously known to a state of knowing is a transcendence, a going beyond, but just for the moment. Once you have the result, it is in hand. It is not transcendent.

Thus it is improper to say you are experiencing "the Transcendent," because any state transcendent to what you are experiencing is not experienced. Transcendence is a method to get from A to B, a state of experience, not a state of objects.

Philosophically maybe but this gets to complicated for the neophyte. What I noticed was I stopped "coming out of meditation". IOW saying the experience of "the transcendent" in activity is merely a way of communicating with other meditators about the experience be it just silence in activity. It is probably easier for them to imagine what having that quiet transcendent feeling in activity is like than imagining silence in activity (confusing).

Indian gurus have through time simplified terms of the experience as much as possible because intellect seemed to have little to do with whether one might develop enlightenment or not. In fact the intellect might often be barrier to such develop because one can develop expectations that actually don't reflect the experience. I swear some think it's like going to be on LSD all the time and that would not be very practical. And intellectualizing about it too much tends to bog things down.



Reply via email to