The important point is: are more people practicing TM due to the research? I'd bet that among the newcomers in the US, not a single new TM practitioner started due to the research. I'd also wager that nobody on this forum that practices TM started because of the research. More likely, it was word of mouth as a catalyst. The research is therefore becoming irrelevant. Besides, its of very low quality.
[FairfieldLife] Re: the quality of research on TM
[email protected] [FairfieldLife] Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:17:06 -0700
- [FairfieldLife] the quality of rese... srijau
- [FairfieldLife] Re: the qualit... [email protected] [FairfieldLife]
- [FairfieldLife] Re: the qualit... [email protected] [FairfieldLife]
