We must remember that the Bible story of Genesis is not a scientific document 
it is a story of creation and of their faith as the Hebrews understood the 
world at that time.  Similarly, the stories in Srimad Bhagavatam and the B. 
Gita were stories of creation as the Hindus understood the world in terms of 
the major Gods of their faith, such as Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva.

 But Susskind's presentation is based on sophisticated mathematics,  current 
scientific researches and astronomical observations--although the presentation 
appears simple and "easy" to grasp.  I'm particularly impressed at the concepts 
he's presenting, such as (1) De Sitter space to show the number of universes or 
multiverses in a simple "cauldron" to describe all of the worlds and universes 
that are within and beyond our observable horizon;  the (2)"light cones" to 
show the various existence  of the universes that "nucleate" or bubble up 
within De Sitter space..  These light cones represent the archivests or 
witnesses within each universes; (3) the assumption of a "slow roll" 
cosmological constant to show that these universes will ultimately generate 
universes that are conducive to human life as we know it..

 In the end, these ideas may be anthropomorphic in principle, which may and may 
not revolve us back to the stories in the Bible and the Vedic texts.

 Overall, I think the concepts presented were thought-provoking and show a 
paradigm shift in cosmology research.  But the scientific community will 
certainly have a few ideas to ponder in the next few years.

---In, <hepa7@...> wrote :

 IMHO, even the first expression of the bible seems refer to the fact(?), that 
universes are created again and again:

 b'reshit , AFAIK, actually means in a beginning, NOT in the beginning,
 which would perhaps be bareshit (b + ha [the] + reshit)?

 But, I believe (not sure, though) in the original Hebrew text, without niqquds 
or vowel diacritics, 
 that distinction doesn't show!


Reply via email to