Is interesting in the article how they define and expect revolution. However 
evidently a regular practice of meditation, even mindfulness meditation, 
evidently brings change to the individual and society as a Meissner-like Effect 
(ME) of meditators on groups.
 Political struggle could hope that society could transform individuals. But 
someone asserting trope that meditating ‘does not require change’ like the 
critique entailed in this article is asserting old school marxist criticism 
that it is social struggles which shape individual condition in 
transformational (revolutionary) change and not necessarily the other way 
around, denying the collective (corporate?) effect of the individual.    
 Assertion from the article: “..mindfulness as a practice and discourse focused 
on the self minimizes social critique and change and contributes to keeping 
existing social injustices and inequitable power structures intact. 
  There is nothing revolutionary about the so-called Mindful Revolution. Chris 
Goto-Jones says: “The revolution doesn’t require any particular change in 
values or economic systems … For a revolution this movement shows remarkable 
conservatism. The leading voices make no demands on followers. They need not 
become activists or participate in political struggle.”
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 

 

 People do make a same indictment of a secular presentation of transcendental 
meditation and a culture in its business .orgs..  Does the stripping away of 
spiritual revival in the presentation necessarily say more about about the 
people and their institution than the practice of meditation. 
 

"..authors argued that a “stripped down, secular technique” of mindfulness 
originating in Buddhism not just fails to serve to awaken people and 
organizations from “the unwholesome roots of greed, ill will and delusion, it 
is usually being refashioned into a banal, therapeutic, self-help technique 
that can actually reinforce those roots."
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 The spiritual moral bypass..
 

"By negating and downplaying actual social and political contexts and focusing 
on the individual, or more so, the individual’s brain, McMindfulness 
interventions ignore seeing our inseparability from all others. They ignore 
seeing our inseparability from inequitable cultural patterns and social 
structures that affect and constitute our relations, and thereby ourselves. 
McMindfulness thus forfeits the moral demand that follows this insight: to 
challenge social inequities and enact universal compassion, service and social 
justice in all forms of human endeavor." (Note where someone points three 
fingers are pointing back at the person) 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 How capitalism captured the mindfulness industry 

 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/apr/16/how-capitalism-captured-the-mindfulness-industry
 
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/apr/16/how-capitalism-captured-the-mindfulness-industry







Reply via email to