--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- cardemaister wrote: > > > > > > Taimni's translation: > > > > > > It (samaadhi) is nearest to those whose > > > desire (for samaadhi) is intensely strong. > > sparaig wrote: > > > When samadhi is close, unstressing is strong. > > Sparaig's translation makes more sense to me. Going > back to my empirical view of things, I've noticed a lot > more people agitated because of samaadhi than liberated > because of their desire for liberation. > > I know some people make the case that nature is set > up to respond to our desires, but I've had so many > powerful, long-held desires go unfulfilled that I have > trouble embracing that worldview. There's too much > disproving data. >
Otherwise we're left with the claimthat a strong desire for no desire leads to a state of no desire... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
