--- In [email protected], a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That there are apparent contradictions as consciousness unfolds, 
> > > > does not imply that ALL contradictory statements are valid or
> > > > "enlightened".  Doublespeak, masquerading as rational or superior
> > > > insights, is the tool of charlatans and political repression.
It is
> > > > manifestation the orwellian vison of 1984. 
> > > > 
> > > > A clear, finely tuned intellect is necessary for realization and
> > > > appreciation of higher states. Muddled thinking, gross and over
> > > > reaching generalizations, are not a sign of higher states, but of
> > > > bondage and ignorance.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for this. I haven't had such a good laugh 
> > > in days.
> > 
> > I dunno... maybe my thinking is muddled, but Akashanon's comment
> > didn't strike me as the least bit funny. 
> > 
> > Yesterday, while alone on a trip to Iowa City, the sentence, "A clear,
> > finely tuned intellect is necessary for realization and appreciation
> > of higher states." was in the back of my mind all day. And judging by
> > my recent experience, I disagree. I can see how a finely tuned
> > intellect would be useful for more accurately conveying in language
> > the experience of non-dual awareness, but for me, at least, the real
> > appreciation has been on the level of heart. Trying to analyze it
> > intellectually is only mildly interesting and somewhat frustrating;
> > but, just innocently being aware of the awareness is like bathing in
> love.
> > 
> > Alex
> 
> 
> I think the word "necessary" was too strong. Though I think MMY in the
> Gita goes that far in saying that. Anyone have those quotes handy?
> "Quite useful" is perhaps a better restatement.
> 
> "Trying to analyze it intellectually" is not away to realize IT. Many
> people get confused on this point. The intellect does realize IT via a
> forward analytical process, but but a reverse process of elimination.
> Like "The Dog that Did Not Bark".
> 
> A refined and sharp intellect can clearly discern what is NOT IT. Via
> a neti neti process, false premises of IT fall away. Utimately, the
> intellect is able to discern between iteslf and IT (Purusha). 
> This is a beautifully inverted and hyper-concise sort of sutra, that
> becomes clear when it happens. 
> 
> There is more to it. Through discrimination (and a growing clarity of
> IT being aware of ITself), the intellect realizes, (in an Eureka like
> moment), that the intellect is not the doer. 
> 
> Up to that point, via neti neti, common sense and reasoning, its clear
> that the doer, (the individual self) is not the body, and its not the
> cognitive/conceptual mind. Realization that the doer is not the
> intellect, or more precisely that the intellect is not a doer, is like
> a sword being pulled out of stone and used to cut away the last ropes
> holding "one" imprisoned. 
> 
> At that point its clear what the intellect is not, and what simply IS.
> The intellect which was thought, felt, held to be "the core", is found
> not to be "the core", and IT is realized to be "the CORE". It is this
> realization of what the "Core" is, is what the intellect can do well.
> It can realize the distiction between buddhi (intellect) and Purusha. 
> 
> On the surface, the words as they are in the sutras, do not sound
> profound, but rather obvious (as in "who would ever mistake the
> intellect which is active and discriminating with wholenss that is
> silence?") . Its when its realized that the real meaning of the sutra
> that the sutra's profoundness unfolds. Its a realization that the
> "core" is not the intellect, and what remains is the "CORE". And  the
> intellect clearly realizes it is different from the CORE. What remains
> --- the fruits of the intellects ability to sharply discern "what is
> NOT"  --- is the CORE.
>

Thanks for taking the time to respond. I'm afraid, a lot of that went
right over my head, but that's ok: there isn't much going on up there
anyway.

Alex






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to