--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 20, 2006, at 7:31 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > What Ihave been told by non-movement Sanskrit scholars is that > > there is > > controversy over whether or not chakras should be considered "vedic." > > Since MMY's emphasis is on "vedic" stuff, perhaps this is why he > > doesn't talk about it much: its not relevant within the context of TM > > and the like. > > LOL. > > You're right, I just looked, mine have "Non-Vedic" product stickers > on 'em! Thanks, I would've missed that. > > Most of Mahesh's system is non-Vedic but sold as Vedic. >
That might be, but define "Vedic" since it covers a 3500 year span in Indian sub-continent history, according to what I have read. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
