--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > In any event, the point here is that unless one is doing > > a non-dual form of quiescence/transcendence meditation, > > there will--by it's very nature always be not only some > > dualism or some subtle meditational "effort" involved. > > To continue this morning's train of thought > in the context of meditation, perhaps a style > of meditation that involves trying to move > from "What is" to "What should be" (whether > that "should be" is coming back to the mantra > or achieving transcendence) is, in Buddhist > terms, indulging and thus perpetuating the > desire/aversion cycle and taking the actor > further away from immersion in "What is."
True, but that, of course, is not a description of TM. > Whereas a technique of meditation that involves > nothing more than paying attention to "What is" For me, that's what TM is. And it's automatic, no effort required for the paying of attention. > or even a concentrated focus *on* "What is" is > facilitating immersion in "What is." > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
