--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I often appreciate your point of view which recognizes the value of > the technique and the notion that some things are at least within > the realm of the conceivable (if not the practical, or maybe even > possible), but I have to ask here--whence arrise the need to test > whose loyalty? > > Why does any governor who had been active *especially* during the > past 15-20 years or longer need their loyalty tested? > > Why does any ordinary practitioner of TM need loyalty at all, let > alone need to have it tested?
I think it's worth noting that the concept of "loyalty test" tends to be promoted here by those who never became TM teachers. They've never risked *anything* or put *anything* on the line for the TM movement. But in their eyes those who have -- for decades -- are legitimately considered "disloyal" because they can no longer stomach the never-ending stream of insanity coming from an insane organization. It's like saying, "These teachers who don't do what they're told are disloyal, whereas we who never did diddleysquat for the TM movement and never will are still loyal." Yeah, right. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
